Noala Degasperis
My feedback
-
5 votesNoala Degasperis
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 voteOpen for voting · 3 comments · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Improvement add-on · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
As well as using restricted access groups as Sam mentions, you could simply not publish the process. That way it's only viewable by owner and expert.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
Just a note in case you weren't aware - those right click options are coming from your internet browser program, not from Promapp.
-
9 votesNoala Degasperis
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesOpen for voting · 2 comments · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Improvement add-on · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Noala Degasperis
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
Hi all! Sorry for the slow response on this one as well as the delayed release. We will be releasing the Reporting API for Improvements Add on in Sept 2019 and next up will be API for Process data, followed by risk but timing on those is TBD.
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
API is in the works (has been for about three years!), and I believe is getting 'close'. Many of us have been waiting a long time for this and it will make our lives so much easier once it's released.
Noala Degasperis
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
Many of us have been waiting for 2+ years for the process management API. It's been dropped off the product roadmap now (maybe they were embarrassed that it just kept getting carried forward each quarter).
I've been told (last year) they're still working on it but there's no date.
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
Hi Les
There are many of us waiting for an improvement in the reporting options in Promapp, including scheduling of reports.You may want to go vote on the suggestion named 'API reporting capabilities' item here in customer voice. Nintex have started work on the API but there's no release date (it's been promised for over 12 months). Hopefully we see it soon!
Noala
-
9 votesNoala Degasperis
shared this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
I agree about the new colour scheme. There's insufficient contrast, Group names in boxes are split inappropriately when they're more than one line long, inability to pin an opened activity box on the map view, fonts appear to be smaller making it difficult to read, it's far too staid and has lost its fun engaging look - and we know Promapp is all about engagement!
Can't help with your approvals issue as we don't have the approvals module. -
7 votesOpen for voting · 1 comment · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Improvement add-on · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Noala Degasperis
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesOpen for voting · 2 comments · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Improvement add-on · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Noala Degasperis
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
Yes!! Our organisation isn't into the swing of regular reviews as yet and I have *hundreds* listed in my own My Reviews tab. I have missed reviewing my own processes because of this.
A review button on overdue processes, visible only by map editors (owners, experts, group process editors, promasters, in addition to a Publish button, or maybe a tickbox when publishing to reset the review date, would be a useful addition.
-
7 votesNoala Degasperis
supported this idea
·
-
54 votes
Thanks for this suggestion! I will add to our prioritization review with the team.
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
We don't have this issue as we turned off the config item for document reviews. As you said, documents are reviewed when any process they're attached to are reviewed so we see no need for a separate document review date.
-
41 votes
Due to the Promapp paradigm that the best processes are simple, streamlined and very uncluttered, this is not on our roadmap for the short term.
While we won’t recommend this approach for the same reasons as above, you may consider using *asterisks" ALL CAPS or other basic callouts if needed. I realize this isn’t your ideal solution but after so many years of seeing what works and what doesn’t, we want to make sure we aren’t losing our core paradigm.
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
I understand Nintex's reason for not including formatting is that process steps are meant to be simple and straight forward, so bolding, underlining etc shouldn't be necessary (this question has been asked in the past here on UserVoice).
A workaround for email addresses specifically is to create them as a weblink, this then makes them very visible and separated out from getting lost in the task text.
To do this, use Weblink and start the URL with mailto: instead of http://
-
9 votesOpen for voting · 2 comments · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Improvement add-on · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Noala Degasperis
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesNoala Degasperis
shared this idea
·
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
Have you considered importing new users instead?
When you use the import function you can (optionally) choose to have Promapp create new roles if the role doesn't yet exist.
The template to use is available from the Users screen.
We use the import function weekly to create new users and it has worked well for us.
-
14 votesNoala Degasperis
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
Are you aware you can run a report to get this information? Of course you can only see your own unpublished processes (ie you have to be the owner or expert for them), unless you're the Promaster or a group process editor.
Admin > Reports > Useful Process Reports > Unpublished / In Progress Process List
-
41 votesOpen for voting · 3 comments · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Improvement add-on · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Noala Degasperis
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
We have a process group named 'Promapp Training' and all practice maps are created in that group during training courses.
Whilst that resolves the having to locate them issue, it'd still be much better if I could bulk delete them rather than individually, so I'm voting for your suggestion :) -
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Noala Degasperis
commented
You can make a link to a shared mailbox using the add Weblink option.
Simply change http:// to mailto: followed by the email address.
Can you say more about how you transfer a document to a new process so I can better understand your proposal and decide whether to vote for it?
In our organisation one document can be linked to multiple process maps (eg the travel policy), so I'm not sure whether your suggestion would work for us.