AdminKerry Hiki
(Admin, Nintex)
My feedback
-
1 voteOpen for voting · 1 comment · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Documents · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 voteOpen for voting · 1 comment · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Risk add-on · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for the suggestion. We don't have this planned on our roadmap right now so we'll open this for voting to measure interest from other customers.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thank you for the suggestion. We don't have this on our roadmap right now so we'll open this for voting and gauge interest from other customers.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thank you for the suggestion. We don't have this on our near term roadmap so for now we'll open this for voting and gauge interest from other customers.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for the idea. Currently you can restrict process groups to certain users but these will still be visible to all Promasters. Also the annual role cost will also be visible to any viewers of the Roles page. I suggest you calculate this outside of Promapp to be safe.
We don't have this on our roadmap right now so we'll open for voting to measure interest from other customers. -
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thank you for the idea. I see how it would be beneficial for a kind of 'find and replace' feature for tags that haven't been explicitly added with a hashtag.
We don't have this planned right now so we'll open this for voting. -
1 voteOpen for voting · 1 comment · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Onboarding & Training add-on · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for the suggestion. I agree that certain scenarios do not require an acknowledgement. This idea is semi-related to the ownership transition idea which separates ownership changes from process content changes.
We don't have this on our near term roadmap so we'll open this for voting to gather interest from other clients. -
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thank you for the suggestion. I agree this would be beneficial. We don't have this planned on our near term roadmap so we'll open for voting for now to gather interest from other clients.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thank you for the suggestion. I agree this would be beneficial. We don't have this planned on our near term roadmap so we'll open for voting for now to gather interest from other clients.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for the suggestion. I agree it would be beneficial to configure the user privilege with just in time provisioning. We don't have this planned on our near term roadmap so we'll open for voting for now to gather interest from other clients.
-
1 voteOpen for voting · 2 comments · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Documents · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thank you for the suggestion. I agree this would be beneficial. We don't have this planned on our near term roadmap so we'll open for voting for now to gather interest from other clients.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for the idea. We don't have plans to allow this change so for now we'll monitor interest from other customers.
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thank you for the suggestion. I agree this would be beneficial. We don't have this planned on our near term roadmap so we'll open for voting for now to gather interest from other clients.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thank you for the suggestion. I can see how this would be beneficial. We don't have this planned on our near term roadmap so we'll open for voting for now to gauge interest from other clients.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for getting in touch. As suggested the best way to do this is via Admin > Users by bulk transferring from a single person to another.
However regarding a mass transfer tool - we don't have this on our roadmap right now so we'll monitor interest from other clients for now.
-
1 voteOpen for voting · 1 comment · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Improvement add-on · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for the suggestion. We don't have this on our roadmap right now so we'll open this for voting to measure interest from other customers.
-
1 voteOpen for voting · 1 comment · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Improvement add-on · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for the suggestion. We don't have this planned right now so we'll open this for voting and gauge interest from other clients.
For now it would be possible to use the Improvement reporting API, and setup some visualisations to highlight any issues/tickets which have been recently edited.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for the suggestion. We don't have plans for this feature right now so we'll open this for voting to gauge interest.
A possible workaround could be to create a special group with specific approvers setup. Once they've approved it could be moved to the appropriate group without any of those additional approvers.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for the suggestion. We don't have plans to change this right now so we'll open this up for voting to gauge interest from other clients.
For now you could consider creating a top-level group, giving the consultants access to only that group, and create shortcut processes in that group. However they will still have access to any other process group which has the 'All Staff' role applied.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminKerry Hiki (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for the suggestion. While importing from XML is limited to Promasters, other process editors can import from procedure text.
We don't have the ability for owners and experts to import XML on our roadmap right now, so we'll monitor interest from other customers.
Thanks for the suggestion. This isn't on our roadmap right now so we'll open this for voting to measure interest from other customers.