Steve Dark

My feedback

  1. 768 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Dark commented  · 

    If I had 100 votes - I would use all 100 on this feature... sorely needed to enable on-prem customers to migrate to SP Online with adequate feature parity.

    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  2. 27 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under Review  ·  Alex responded

    Thanks for the feedback, we are currently reviewing this request.

    If this is something you would like to see added, please remember to vote up the idea.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Dark commented  · 

    Last 'under review' update 2/9/2014 - I assume this has been in the product now and we just didn't realize it?

    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  3. 125 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under Review  ·  Euan Gamble responded

    This will be something we will include when we bring the New Responsive designer to SharePoint.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  4. 83 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Dark commented  · 

    Any feedback Nintex? We have clients that drastically need this functionality and have a strong preference to avoid this sort of hack:http://matthewyarlett.blogspot.com/2014/12/provisioning-new-nintex-workflow.html.

    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  5. 235 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  6. 698 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Dark commented  · 

    First off - love the current Print to PDF feature! But this is a very common ask from a large pool of our clients and prospects. Most are interested in converting a form to PDF as a last step in a process to submit the completed/approved form to a records management repository. While they can do it manually by opening the form and printing to PDF there is a lot of interest to include (simple) form to PDF conversion in the workflow.

  7. 102 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  8. 25 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  9. 476 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jon Hardy responded

    The task ID is populated once the task is completed. Before this the task list items can be locked by the task engine for processing and a workflow accessing this task may fail. There has been therefore a strong reservation form our Engineering group to implement this capability even if technically feasible.

    If one wishes to delegate the task then the delegation should be used.

    Should you have other use cases for accessing the task list before the task is completed then please let us know what they are. There may be an alternative way of meeting this need that will not introduce the possibility of workflow failure.

    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  10. 203 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  1 - Nintex Workflow for SharePoint  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  11. 92 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  6 - Nintex Mobile/App Studio  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Dark commented  · 

    I'm working on a project right now that would really benefit from this approach. This particular project consists of multiple inspection forms that contain 2+ sections of tabular data input.

    I would love to see this added to the roadmap.

  12. 144 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Open for voting  ·  Euan Gamble responded

    Thanks for your suggestion Andrew. As we are currently working on Universal Forms and rebuilding all our controls for the new technology platform, we will be considering this feedback for the new control.

    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  13. 145 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Open for voting  ·  Euan Gamble responded

    Thanks for your suggestion Vadim. As we are currently building Universal Forms for Office 365, SharePoint and Nintex Workflow Cloud, we are considering how we move forward with Live Forms with all the Nintex Infrastructure.

    We currently support Google reCaptcha in Nintex Forms for Nintex Workflow Cloud which may suit your needs as the platform supports anonymous forms and pushing data to different systems.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  14. 373 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Open for voting  ·  Euan Gamble responded

    Hi all,

    There is no movement on this feature at this time. If the status changes, I will update this ticket.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Dark commented  · 

    I agree - please add this feature or provide a viable workaround.

    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
  15. 31 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  2 - Nintex Forms for SharePoint » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Planned  ·  Euan Gamble responded

    Thanks for your suggestion Fernando.

    We have incorporated this feedback into our latest formula builder in Universal Forms.

    I will update this feature when we get closer to release of Universal Forms for SharePoint.

    Steve Dark supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Dark commented  · 

    I absolutely agree with this request. I was about to put a request in myself. This is quite possibly the biggest issue my clients face - if a rule is invalid then the resulting JavaScript errors prevent the form from rendering. Our experience is that finding the culprit can be very problematic and often requires the use of the browser dev tools to do so. I wouldn't not expect a power user to have to resort to this.

    Being able to validate your formulas at design time (like InfoPath offered) would be a very desirable feature to add.

  16. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  1 - Nintex Workflow for SharePoint  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Steve Dark shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base