Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 561 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Debugging is key to every software and development environment, so these type of graphical tools NEED to be present in my toolbox. There must be a reason why this is not present in Online while having it for years present OnPrem. So awaiting your feedback on this one.

  2. 277 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 50 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 279 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hi Guys,

    We are just planing out a new Copy Item action which will also look to support an option to include attachments. Beyond this are there any other requirements that you would need from a copy item action?

    Cheers, Rick

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Not only for Lists but also a Copy/or Move Library Item, include the following:
    - Versioning Yes/No
    - Attachments
    - Retain Source Yes/No
    - Skip / Overwrite Item in Target
    - Meta Data Include Yes/No
    - Content Type Yes/No
    ...

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 273 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365 » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Open for voting  ·  Jon Hardy responded

    Reinstating this request as it is clear that delegation is required and not escalation.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 446 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hi All,

    We’ve just released the ability to capture comments from via LazyApproval, apart from that you can also easily store and retrieve those comments (including ones made via Nintex Forms or directly via the task) into a new task action variable (Task comments).

    For those who are specifically interested in capturing from LazyApproval the way you do is by supplying the outcome separated by a comma and then the comments .e.g. ‘Rejected, Need more detail before can approve’.

    Check it out and let me know what you think…

    Cheers, Rick

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Common guys, why is this Major functionality not present, a big Misser in my eyes :-(

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 644 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    To support this requirement we’ve just release the following features

    - Specify a customizable sender display name for both email and task actions, we understand one of the main requests was to be able to supply a custom from email address however due to many of the limitations in the cloud we are currently unable to deliver this request and so hopefully being able to add a From display name will get you one step closer..

    - Add a customizable Reply To email address for the email action so you can control the email address when people hit reply.

    Hope you enjoy these features and be great to hear any feedback once you try them out.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Any progress on this topic please ??? It's for sure required !

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 198 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thank you to everyone for your continued feedback regarding this feature.

    Our new Responsive designer will support multi-page and will be coming in the next few months.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    What is the workaround please ?

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Please provide this functionality ASAP as this is key to many Form designs.

  10. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 286 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    This is still in the backlog to be done.

    Our priority is on Universal Forms for Office365 at the moment. As this functionality is in Nintex for SharePoint, we will need to bring this functionality to the codebase (which is then shared with 365 Forms).

    I will update this feature when we begin development on this feature.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Please make this happen a this is a powerful construct almost used in every application we have. Very strange that this standard SharePoint column functionality isn't in place????

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base