D. M.

My feedback

  1. 14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    D. M. supported this idea  · 
  2. 201 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  4 - Nintex Forms for Office 365 » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    D. M. supported this idea  · 
  3. 379 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    D. M. supported this idea  · 
  4. 449 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hi All,

    We’ve just released the ability to capture comments from via LazyApproval, apart from that you can also easily store and retrieve those comments (including ones made via Nintex Forms or directly via the task) into a new task action variable (Task comments).

    For those who are specifically interested in capturing from LazyApproval the way you do is by supplying the outcome separated by a comma and then the comments .e.g. ‘Rejected, Need more detail before can approve’.

    Check it out and let me know what you think…

    Cheers, Rick

    D. M. supported this idea  · 
  5. 302 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  2 - Nintex Forms for SharePoint » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi all,

    With the development of Universal Forms, we are looking at how the current form modes are supported in the existing product.

    At this time we are still planning to continue using functions to detect form modes. This is so we are able to support migrations but also give a lot of flexibility in the rules engine.

    We do not plan to bring different layouts to Universal Forms at this time. As we are introducing multipage to Universal Forms, we do need to figure out how a multipage form will be printed and is under consideration.

    I will update this feature when we release an Advance Preview of Universal Forms if our position changes based on feedback.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    D. M. supported this idea  · 
  6. 333 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jon Hardy responded

    We are currently at the early stages of evaluating the whole topic of workflow documentation.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D. M. commented  · 

    This would be awesome.

    D. M. supported this idea  · 
  7. 258 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Open for voting  ·  Jon Hardy responded

    Please have a look at the condition builder just released as part of conditional start. Is this the kind of condition builder that you need in “wait for field change in current item” ?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D. M. commented  · 

    The fact that you cannot wait for a field to 'not be empty' is incredibly limiting.

    D. M. supported this idea  · 
  8. 364 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    D. M. supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D. M. commented  · 

    I agree. Please add this feature as cross-organisation commenting is very desirable for referencing and historical analysis.

Feedback and Knowledge Base