ScottK

My feedback

  1. 29 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ScottK commented  · 

    Using OOTB Nintex validation rules to confirm or conditional require Managed Metadata input would be very useful.

    ScottK supported this idea  · 
  2. 120 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ScottK commented  · 

    Will this functionality be coming to classic?

    ScottK supported this idea  · 
  3. 208 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    ScottK supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ScottK commented  · 

    MMS updating is a fairly arduous process - direct update from workflow to MMS field would be great.

  4. 30 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    ScottK supported this idea  · 
  5. 142 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thanks for your suggestion Vadim. As we are currently building Universal Forms for Office 365, SharePoint and Nintex Workflow Cloud, we are considering how we move forward with Live Forms with all the Nintex Infrastructure.

    We currently support Google reCaptcha in Nintex Forms for Nintex Workflow Cloud which may suit your needs as the platform supports anonymous forms and pushing data to different systems.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    ScottK supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ScottK commented  · 

    We have recently pushed some Live forms to our external website and our marketing department hasn't asked for this yet, but it is a standard function on many simple forms that I'm expecting them to ask for soon. If you got out ahead of this request, that would be ideal so when they ask we're ready.

  6. 81 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    ScottK supported this idea  · 
  7. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    ScottK shared this idea  · 
  8. 291 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  2 - Nintex Forms for SharePoint  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi all,

    With the development of Universal Forms, we are including accepted file types, rule-based logic for required/not-required, maximum number of files, minimum number of files, and maximum file size. This should also include invalida characters.

    If you have any other requirements, please let us know in the comments section below.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    ScottK supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ScottK commented  · 

    I know it's a Nintex charter to try and get rid of JavaScript helps like this - please add the attachment validation soon...

  9. 375 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    We are currently building the functionality to see List Item attachments in Task Forms for New Responsive Forms for Office365.

    This functionality will also be included in the New Responsive Forms for SharePoint when it is released.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    ScottK commented  · 

    need this now.

Feedback and Knowledge Base