shaunlub

My feedback

  1. 367 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    OK, 4 years after being suggested. 2 years after been set to planned. Where is this?
    This is stopping us from migrating current solutions that have a lot of columns, to newer versions of the form, which we can now setup to work more efficiently.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    This has been set to planned since summer 2018. Do we have any indication as to when this will be started? This was requested first in 2014.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    This has been planned for over 6 months now. Any indication as to when this will be started and/or implemented?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    In addition, having the ability to copy list items' data (almost) in entirety, would greatly assist migration between versions of 365 Forms. Currently, this nearly always needs to be an in-place change. Creating the new version and using workflows to migrate the data over to the new form version would be a great tool. We hope to use Universal Forms, when it comes to 365 - we'd really benefit from having a tool to 1) copy test data; 2) migrate over previous data to the new forms list.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    When we used InfoPath, copying the form (with attachments) to another form library (with the same form template) was a great way of archiving non-active forms, keeping the current library from getting clogged up with older non-active entries.
    I would love to see this with Nintex 365 in lists.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    As stated below, copying contents that are not necessarily promoted out into SharePoint - form only values, and non-default attachments which are not saved out into SharePoint - would be great.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    If there were a way to copy the whole form.xml part of the item, along with the attachment, that would be great. Create Item will only give us SharePoint promoted columns

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    Basically, we require to be able to copy List Items, with attachments intact; not with attachments in a separate document library. This would allow us to archive list items after completion. The list items and the attachments are not only viewed as transactional data, but as records, that will later be searched and looked at.
    The ability to archive also helps us maintain the performance of the working list so that it does not come close to SharePoint thresholds.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    Has this come close to being reviewed yet?

    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  2. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365 » Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  3. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  4. 105 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  2 - Nintex Forms for SharePoint  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  5. 272 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi All,

    This is currently a SharePoint limitation, however we have made sure that our lazy approval feature only allows people who are assigned a task to specify an outcome.

    As a workaround a user is able to query the task list to see who was assigned the task and who modified the task. We are looking at how make the task querying process easier. Thanks.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    I was not sure at first. But I actually like that it is possible for other people to approve forms - provided whoever approves is correctly recorded. This mirrors many paper or email flow processes where temporary approval authority may be given to a subordinate or other manager when the assigned approver is on leave, has left the company or is unable to complete the task for some other reason.
    To ensure the approver is the assigned person, putting a rule on the form's decision control, checking the current user is equal to the assigned person would solve this issue for most cases

    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  6. 376 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    We are currently building the functionality to see List Item attachments in Task Forms for New Responsive Forms for Office365.

    This functionality will also be included in the New Responsive Forms for SharePoint when it is released.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  7. 23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365 » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    Following the link, MS says it has done the necessary. Any chance of using this in Nintex 365 WF anytime?

    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  8. 162 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    The BCC would basically be to check emails have gone out. There is no visibility other wise. We can see the tasks have been assigned - but not if emails have arrived.

    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  9. 78 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  10. 200 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  2 - Nintex Forms for SharePoint » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  11. 686 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    To support this requirement we’ve just release the following features

    - Specify a customizable sender display name for both email and task actions, we understand one of the main requests was to be able to supply a custom from email address however due to many of the limitations in the cloud we are currently unable to deliver this request and so hopefully being able to add a From display name will get you one step closer..

    - Add a customizable Reply To email address for the email action so you can control the email address when people hit reply.

    Hope you enjoy these features and be great to hear any feedback once you try them out.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    We have emails coming from external accounts labeled as EXTERNAL - to prevent phishing attacks. The current generic SharePoint email address used for sending emails also gets this treatment - so that some are wary of opening and working on tasks or forms linked from such emails.
    I would hope having a FROM address set to the workflow initiator or an item modified by person's address would avoid this, and be a lot more useful than a generic Whozat@sharepoint

    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  12. 322 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  13. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Open for voting  ·  0 comments  ·  4 - Nintex Forms for Office 365 » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    shaunlub shared this idea  · 
  14. 110 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    shaunlub commented  · 

    Sjoerd => responsive forms do not allow CSS or JS, I believe. (As this would ***** with the form design). I don't think there is any place to put this in form settings.

    shaunlub shared this idea  · 
  15. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  16. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  17. 641 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    41 comments  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365 » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  18. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  19. 91 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365 » Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
  20. 46 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    shaunlub supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base