Andrzej
My feedback
-
12 votesOpen for voting · 2 comments · 7 - Nintex Promapp » Improvement add-on · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesOpen for voting · 0 comments · 5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud » Workflow Designer · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesUnder Review · 0 comments · 5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud » Form Designer · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesOpen for voting · 0 comments · 5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud » Workflow Designer · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
67 votes
Thanks for your suggestion.
I will update the ticket if we have anything to share on this idea.
Cheers,
EuanAndrzej
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesOpen for voting · 2 comments · 5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud » Dashboard Experience · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Thank you for your feeback and we can certainly understand the ask. We are in the very early stages of gathering market data and feedback, like yours. and planning to address within our roadmap.
Andrzej
shared this idea
·
-
8 votesOpen for voting · 1 comment · 5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud » Xtensions · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Andrzej
shared this idea
·
-
5 votes
This is currently planned where the Convert a value action will be extended to support string to date.
An error occurred while saving the comment Andrzej
commented
OOB String to date conversion is still needed and makes working with dates pretty painful whenever you need to interact with anything external.
When adding, please also allow for specifying the format to be parsed, otherwise we will all end up with requests to add more date formats (just like with the date to string requests).Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesOpen for voting · 4 comments · 5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud » Workflow Designer · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Andrzej
commented
+1 for AdrianM below - just let us input the date format string and add reference to the docs (it's a one-time thing, those don't change). Even without the full names support (localizations can get tricky) this would solve a lot of issues with dates formatting.
Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
We’re reviewing this request internally.
Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesUnder Review · 2 comments · 5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud » Form Designer · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
We’ve started investigating this feature, will update when confirmed.
If anyone has any feedback to share on how they see this capability working then please reach out to me directly.
Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
111 votesOpen for voting · 4 comments · 5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud » Other · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Thank you for the suggestion.
Is this a matter of just protecting the view on the instance start details? or is there more to consider when classifying the secured inputs?
Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
33 votes
I’m happy to share that we have deeper AD integration on our roadmap. We will update you as we have more specific timing.
Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesAndrzej
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesAndrzej
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Andrzej
commented
+1, especially since PO/PE exist in default Promapp instances, and is used in the default Process Management processes. For us it was a "huh?" moment when we realized they are not a system role.
@Kerry - while they are an ownership right, that ownership comes with a responsibility (although agreed it is not a role per se). Especially for newer PE's it would be very valuable to get automatically added to that responsibility, since it's not necessarily the Promasters or BA's that select who these are, while you need to be one of those to edit the role/responsibility entry and add them. This makes the job of Process Group Champions more laborous than needed, as whenever they change PO/PE assignments, they need to make sure that someone checks the role/responsibility.Andrzej
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesAndrzej
supported this idea
·
The "B" part would also be relevant for updating workflow to EngineV2 (and subsequent ones) since some of the built-in actions also need to be recreated.