Ibrahim Al-Nimri

My feedback

  1. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  6 - Nintex Mobile/App Studio  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  John Corry responded

    @Jimmy thanks for offering this suggestion. If we did introduce this control we would not be able to support it in offline mode for obvious reasons.

    I’m interested in knowing if people would find this confusing or not as today all of Nintex Mobile’s controls work offline.

    If we begin to introduce controls that are inherently online and mix them with our current offline controls, then the person designing mobile forms and apps will need to remember which is which.

    Would this cause confusion?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri commented  · 

    it will be a dream come true to have web request on mobile.

    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  2. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  6 - Nintex Mobile/App Studio  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri shared this idea  · 
  3. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  6 - Nintex Mobile/App Studio  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  John Corry responded

    @James This is a fantastic idea. Would the idea be that the user is only able to open the form at that location or do you see the feature as more of a filter that helps him find the relevant for the location?

    We should also considered the reliability of getting a GPS position when in built up areas. Restricting access to a form could be annoying in this situation.

    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  6 - Nintex Mobile/App Studio  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri shared this idea  · 
  5. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  6 - Nintex Mobile/App Studio  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  6. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  6 - Nintex Mobile/App Studio  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  7. 129 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  8. 242 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  9. 263 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    This feature is now available from the latest versions outline below

    Nintex Workflow for SharePoint 2013 v3.5.2.0
    Nintex for SharePoint 2016 v4.5.2.0
    Nintex for SharePoint 2019 v5.1.2.0

    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  10. 641 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hey all,
    There looks to be 2 requests here
    - Update Inline function to allow calculate date difference, factoring in only business days / hours
    - Update Calculate date action to factor in only business days / hours
    Can you please share which of the two you require and your use cases
    Thanks
    Lisa

    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  11. 676 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  12. 310 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  13. 293 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    24 comments  ·  2 - Nintex Forms for SharePoint  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi all,

    With the development of Universal Forms, we are including accepted file types, rule-based logic for required/not-required, maximum number of files, minimum number of files, and maximum file size. This should also include invalida characters.

    If you have any other requirements, please let us know in the comments section below.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  14. 200 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  2 - Nintex Forms for SharePoint » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  15. 331 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  2 - Nintex Forms for SharePoint  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi all,

    Drag and drop has been included into Universal Forms in our current build. We have no plans to bring this current functionality to Classic Forms.

    Once we have shipped Universal Forms for SharePoint, we will close this feature request.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  16. 302 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  2 - Nintex Forms for SharePoint » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi all,

    With the development of Universal Forms, we are looking at how the current form modes are supported in the existing product.

    At this time we are still planning to continue using functions to detect form modes. This is so we are able to support migrations but also give a lot of flexibility in the rules engine.

    We do not plan to bring different layouts to Universal Forms at this time. As we are introducing multipage to Universal Forms, we do need to figure out how a multipage form will be printed and is under consideration.

    I will update this feature when we release an Advance Preview of Universal Forms if our position changes based on feedback.

    Cheers,
    Euan

    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  17. 281 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  18. 70 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  19. 64 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
  20. 236 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  1 - Nintex Workflow for SharePoint  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ibrahim Al-Nimri supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base