Abhijith R Shastry

My feedback

  1. 57 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  2. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  1 - Nintex Workflow for SharePoint  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Abhijith R Shastry commented  · 

    I support this idea as it would help organizations build powerful workflows, and begin to eliminate the dependency of using PowerShell (at least a bit)

    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  3. 67 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  4 - Nintex Forms for Office 365 » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for your suggestion Ben. This is in the backlog to be built in our new Responsive Forms designer.

    This will be implemented through the new rules engine, allowing you to dynamically change the submit button redirect address based on conditions in your rules.

    I will update this feature when we begin development.

    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  4. 654 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    To support this requirement we’ve just release the following features

    - Specify a customizable sender display name for both email and task actions, we understand one of the main requests was to be able to supply a custom from email address however due to many of the limitations in the cloud we are currently unable to deliver this request and so hopefully being able to add a From display name will get you one step closer..

    - Add a customizable Reply To email address for the email action so you can control the email address when people hit reply.

    Hope you enjoy these features and be great to hear any feedback once you try them out.

    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  5. 132 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  6. 86 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hi All,

    With each of the requested actions could you please tell be what scenarios you are using each of them? From the list could you please order them in most important to each import?

    Cheers,
    Roanna

    Abhijith R Shastry commented  · 

    Hello Roanna,
    Below is one of the many scenarios - Think about you call the 'Create Site' action from the workflow after which, you need to perform all the listed actions.

    In my opinion, the order specified in the above list can be considered the order of priority.

    Best Regards,
    Abhijith

  7. 70 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  8. 394 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Open for voting  ·  Jon Hardy responded

    Without going into the technical detail; the previous value made available in conditional start is actually the current value just before any updates are made to the item. When the item is updated, we lose the ability to get the value prior to the update.

    To restate the workaround as indicated in the idea; create an additional column in the list or library and update this with the current value of the column of interest. Then when the actual column is updated, the previous value is still available in the additional column. Of course one need not make this additional column visible in the view or Form so the users are not confused.

    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  9. 51 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
    Abhijith R Shastry commented  · 

    Thanks Santoshi for creating this post.

  10. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Abhijith R Shastry commented  · 

    At least by now, Nintex should have provided ability to delete permanently. Since this is very much possible through Client-Object Model, it should be made available through workflows too.

    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  11. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  12. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365 » Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Abhijith R Shastry shared this idea  · 
  13. 446 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hi All,

    We’ve just released the ability to capture comments from via LazyApproval, apart from that you can also easily store and retrieve those comments (including ones made via Nintex Forms or directly via the task) into a new task action variable (Task comments).

    For those who are specifically interested in capturing from LazyApproval the way you do is by supplying the outcome separated by a comma and then the comments .e.g. ‘Rejected, Need more detail before can approve’.

    Check it out and let me know what you think…

    Cheers, Rick

    Abhijith R Shastry commented  · 

    This is a much required feature that should be made available at-least in the next release

    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  14. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
    Abhijith R Shastry commented  · 

    Please have this action in Site-Workflows, with configurable source and destination URLs. I do not know why it is still not there, after so many versions of Nintex Workflow being rolled-out.

  15. 32 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  16. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  1 - Nintex Workflow for SharePoint  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Abhijith R Shastry shared this idea  · 
  17. 79 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  18. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 
  19. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  3 - Nintex Workflow for Office 365 » Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Abhijith R Shastry supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base