7 - Nintex Promapp

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Not enough information in Decision Boxes - Text Cut off in Decision Boxes

    Text cuts off in decision boxes.
    Can you expand text when hovering over the box, so can see the full question.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. QR codes

    Are there any plans to introduce QR codes for processes?

    We’ve got a request to set up a promapp process for charging an electric vehicle, and I’m thinking of best ways to set this up for users.
    Having a QR code on the dashboard that links to the process would be a very useful option!

    Rather than all promapp users producing their own QR codes, I wonder if Nintex could set this up for all to use

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Ensure Out-of-Date Process Report and Process List Report are consistent

    Refer to Nintex Support Case #00276547.
    The Process Name in the Process List Report is concatenated with the Reference Number but in the Out-of-Date Process List Report the Reference number is not included.
    Either remove the Reference Number for the Process List Report or included the Reference Number in the Out-of-Date Process List Repaort

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Make the base variation visible (PVM).

    When working with variables if you want the 'base' process to be visible to users you have to make an exact copy of it. This makes maintenance difficult as you must remember to never change the 'copy'. If the process truly is a base process, why wouldn't we want it visible to users?

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Customise Menu item

    I would like to be able to change Help> Contact Promaster to Contact (My company name) Promaster.
    Staff have said they thought that by clicking the Contact Promaster option it would send a message to Promapp / Nintex. They did not realise it would contact the in house SME, which is what they wanted to do.

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Enable true document editing/control in document library

    Enable true document control with a check in/out process for editing of revision of documents within document library. Similar to the process for editing processes, a user with edit rights for a document could have a draft revision in process and submit for approval within Promapp. The draft would be "checked out" and visible only to the editor/owner/Promaster (just like the process with processes under draft revision in the PAW module) until approved and published. Much more like a SharePoint process for document control. This would enable Promapp as a standalone document control/editing/approval solution.

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Documents  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Timeframe incorrectly showing error message

    In Timeframe, when we indicate 0 minute for Wait Time, an error message appears showcasing 'timeframe information is missing, therefore total times may not be accurate'. This bug needs to be fixed

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Timeframes for investigations

    Within the timeframes for investigations in the Improvements module there is currently a low, medium ad high assignment for investigations....could we add an 'extreme' to allign it with our current risk management framework?

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Improvement add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Option to make feedback only visible to Owner/Expert

    An option (like a tick box) for the person submitting feedback to only make it visible to expert/owner (and promasters).

    This may encourage more honest feedback if they know it's not going to be seen by the rest of the Promapp community (in our case, all employees).

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Add option to also calculate a Residual Risk Score AND define/use Default Rating Criteria

    , there does not appear to be an option to also calculate a Residual Risk Score AND define/use Default Rating Criteria 4. Switching the Scoring Scheme does not bring back the expected results.

    • Scoring Scheme = Calculated Residual
    o Default Rating Criteria 1 = Likelihood
    o Default Rating Criteria 2 = Severity
    o Default Rating Criteria 3 = Control Effectiveness
    o Default Rating Criteria 4 = Custom (e.g. Manual Complexity)
    • Inherent Risk = 1 x 2 <<Here, we would expect to see 1 x 2 x 4>>
    • Residual Risk = 1 x 2 x 3 x 4…

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Risk add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. All users to add processes to LG Promapp

    It would be great is we could allow users to submitt processes to the LG promapp site to share processes.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Centralised weblink management

    I want to be able to manage weblinks from a central location. I have a number of web based platforms in use within our organisation which we attach to processes very regularly. Ideally this would be part of a table where i can manage all regular weblinks.
    Extensions of this table could include regex management and system tagging so that a system tag could be attached to the weblink automatically.
    Linking from within a process would work in a similar way to document linking where i have the choice of selecting a regular weblink or creating a new weblink.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Using upload functions i.e. Roles, rather than a count reported, identify rows as added, not added, updated

    Getting feedback as to the rows which are added would help understanding the outcome of using the upload function.
    In Roles upload for example, a result which states 'x number of rows have been updated' it is impossible to know what bit of the data was updated, was it the 'type' or the users.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Processes disappear from the list of New and Changed processes prematurely

    When a process changes/or is created that someone needs to be made aware of it shows up in there "New Processes" and "Changed Process" list.
    You have 3 options View the process by clicking on the name of the processes hyperlink, View the process by clicking on the View button and click Seen it....
    Once the process is selected by clicking on the hyperlink it takes you to the process and then is removed from the list. The danger here is that the stakeholder may not have fully reviewed the process. I watched one of our users do this, he…

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Training module configuration

    To be able to add/configure the timeframes in the onboarding section, currently there is week 1, month 1 etc but there are certain important topics that are Day 1 especially around H&S. Also to add/configure other options such as induction as we use onboarding as a pre-induction process.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Onboarding & Training add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Viewing rights visibility and editing from Users Tab

    See viewing rights granted on the users tab of Promapp, not only the editor rights. Editing viewing rights there would result in a more certain, non-Excel based handling of users and less of incoming user requests due to lack of appropriate viewing rights set.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Change wording in Process Change Description When process is Published

    The wording in the Process change description can be very misleading. As a Promaster when i have approved and Published changes to a process that another user has made it states that the "name of Promaster" has made changes to the Process and includes that description that the user that made the changes had actually written.. Not the promaster.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. 'Drag' functionality to quickly add process into the 'process group overview'

    Being able to drag processes into the process group overview instead of having to add each process by selecting it from the list of processes. Once they are all in you can then put them in the right order and assign roles to it.
    This would be so much quicker, user friendly and intuitive (I have noticed that dragging a process from the left hand side of the screen is what new users of Promapp automatically try to do until they learn that this is NOT how it works)

    6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Sharing embedded process links

    I want to be able to generate/share process links for embedded processes. We operate a number of Promapp environments within the organisation. Some users only have access to a platform which hosts embedded processes. I would like the users operating on this environment to be able to share and create minimode links for these processes. No other functionality of process embedding should change as part of this idea.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Nicholas – First of all, we’d love to have your join our Advance Preview program for Embedded Processes since you are one of the few customers who have adopted it (I think you have already signed up). Your request to be able to share embedded processes is very valid and I will raise with the team. Thanks for sharing

  20. Option for numbers only field type in improvements form fields

    When setting up form fields there is a list of options to choose from for field type. If we could have a number field type that would force numbers only input it would guide users to enter the correct type of information and cut down on fix-ups.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Improvement add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base