7 - Nintex Promapp

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Ability to change the "Promaster" terminology across the system

    Could we please have the ability to change the "Promaster" terminology across the platform - similar to how we can Exec Sponsor Title and Lead Process Champion Title?

    We are finding the team are unnecessarily contacting the Nintex Promapp support team for questions that could be directed to the "Promasters" instead. When they go to the Help Menu they have to pick between the options "Contact Support" or "Contact Promaster" and as "Promaster" is not a role tile or responsibility within our organisation, team members often mistakenly choose "Contact Support".
    This issue is confounded by the fact our organisation uses…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Front page search All or Processes I'm In

    Include the choice to search all pages or filter to Processes I'm In - so that the Processes I'm In capability is intuitive and not hidden.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. User Dashboard

    We have a Process Dashboard but a new pivot could be to also have as user dashboard.

    This dashboard could be sortable by timeframe. It could show total users that accessed the tool during the time frame, processes viewed, unique users each days in that time frame. This would make it easier to present data.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Enable the ability to re-name the role "Process Group Champion"

    Process roles such as Process Owners and Process Experts are universal but a Process Group Champion isn't. I'd like to see Nintex Promapp provide the ability to rename the title of this role please. We may have an established role title in the business that has similar responsibilities that we want to apply to Promapp or just may not find the term "champion" appropriate. Cheers

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Add Automated/scheduled Reports

    Add option to automate sending of various reports such as Process overdue for review or approvals. Allow to outline report groups that receive an automated report to confirm overdue task are not being missed.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Checklist permissions

    Hi
    It would be good to be able to set permissions on checklists.
    At the moment checklists are open to anyone – they can’t be locked down – anyone can edit them.
    It would be good to have the option to have set users/groups to be able to view/edit/create checklists.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  4 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Ability to view failed login attempts

    When not using SSO it would be advantageous to see failed login attempts.
    Anecdotally some users have forgotten their password and as a result are just not using Promapp at all, rather than getting a reset.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Showing linked docs/png etc on change log

    Today our discussion resulted in an additional piece of information for change log functionality.

    Though we have the ability to put in comments. A great addition, would be having an indicator if an additional file is added or linked and a call out. Allowing for easier identification to revert to that point.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Process reviews should not need to be republished

    When processes are up for review they often don't need any changes. At present we are forced to make a minor change (ie. add a space somewhere) just to trigger the approval process to remove the process from the review cycle. This also updates the version which should not be necessary. It would be great to see an option to acknowledge the process has been reviewed and mark it as complete without having to republish.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Process Acknowledgement - wording - "published" rather than "changed" when published by Promaster

    As Promaster when publishing processes, process changes to acknowledge states "process has been changed by [promaster name]", it would be preferable to state "process has been published by [promaster name]", I find employees think I am changing the process, where in fact as promaster I am publishing the process, not making the changes.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Being able to filter between overdue Processes and over due Documents

    Currenty on the "My Reviews" tab, you can see items which are Overdue, due in 3 months and due in 12 months.

    It would be great if we could expand the selection of filters by:
    - Adding a filter for Type i.e. Documents, Processes, Policies so our time poor Process Owners can focus their energies on the type of content which is higher risk
    - Adding flexible time filters - being able to filter by overdue, 3 and 12 months is great but if our owners want to see whats due in the comming month or comming 6 months they…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. More detail in Status column of the Process List report

    It would be great to have more detail in the Status column of the Process List report. Currently there seems to be only Published or Unpublished. I'd like to see 'Awaiting Approval' or 'In Progress' rather than 'Unpublished'. That way it would reflect the status as shown in the process itself (next to the title).

    20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  4 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Turn off scroll wheel zooming for embed pages

    When you embed a process in a SharePoint site, scrolling the page often ends up with the process map zooming out as you scroll past it.

    It would be good to change the default scroll behaviour to NOT change the zoom level, either in embedded pages, or within Promapp.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Improved wording and explaination in error messages

    It would be fantastic if there were a variety of error messages instead of the generic "Whoops that wasn't meant to happen" and "Contact your Promaster" error messages.

    Current when users come across those error messages they will contact the Promaster and provide a screenshot, however the message is so vague that it can be incredible difficult for the Promaster to trouble shoot before determining whether it needs to be escalated to Nintex Promapp as a bug. It would be great if the error message included a description of the type of error or a code of some sort etc.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. SAML - Attribute Based Assignment possible

    We are shifting to AzureAD as our Identity and Access Solution. We have been told your product doesn't support Attribute-Based Assignment.

    The assignment of users should be able to be completed using with attribute-based functions Example expression:
    AAD Group = "MarketingUsers" then added to Promapp role “Marketing”

    Users can then be assigned the correct roles when they join or move teams automatically instead of the manual process which involves a delay to the user and a waste of admin time in provisioning and in UAR (user access review)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Enable 2 separate role allocation lists in the user profile (primary & secondary roles)

    Having the ability to allocate roles in 2 separate lists would enable roles to be allocated as a primary role or roles i.e. main job, and secondary role or roles i.e. interested in, which would effectively be a means to 'subscribe' to process notifications.

    The secondary role could be controlled by the user themselves as well in the User management page.

    The content of the notification email could be segregate by primary and secondary roles so the user can see which updates affect them directly and those that they have an interest in.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Add more fields to the user data

    Add more fields to the user data to enable differentiation between users with the same or similar names. This extra data should be displayed in the various user selection fields.

    Suggestions are (in no particular order): Job Title, Location, Department.

    In a company of 5000+ employees we have many occurrences of people with similar names (e.g. Andrew Smith or Andy Smith) and it is impossible know which is the one you want to pick in the various user selections fields.

    Also, we use SSO and we have found that any 'extra' info we manually add to the name fields is…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Show input/trigger and output title in map view

    We notice that staff rarely look at the inputs and outputs because in the map view it doesn't show what the specific input/output is, and in the procedure view the input is listed at the end of the process activities. Therefore our inputs/trigger information is mapped as Activity 1 in most processes.

    Suggestion to improve this: the green input/trigger box show the activity name - as it does for each activity in the body of the process. Likewise for the output box.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Publication Declined should revert new process to Unpublished instead of In Progress

    A new Process is in PAW (revision 0.xx) and Awaiting Publish. Once declined and back into editing state, it lists as In Progress. Instead, it needs to revert to Unpublished because the process has not been previously published. This inaccurate label confuses reporting.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base