Make it possible to extract a report for each role where its RACI is evidenced.
This report would allow us to see for which processes a certain role is responsible, is consulted, is a stakeholder, etc.

Our business has process writers that write on behalf of SMEs and Owners. They do not receive notifications when there is feedback provided nor when processes are ready for review. If there was a Process Writer field they would be able to receive notifications and see all feedback sent through for them to action or acknowledge

As we increase in process maturity more users would like to use active/wait timeframes and lean tags. At the moment only one tag can be shown on the map at a time. It would be great if you could select more than one (e.g. active AND wait times, active time AND lean, lean AND system) rather than toggling between options.

This is particularly important for the staff undertaking Lean Six Sigma training and improving processes.

There needs to be a way to add permissions to sub-groups so that we can set up consultants with access when they need to work with a specific team without giving them access to all of the processes.

I understand this would be a structural change but the current workaround of making the process group a top-level group isn't really viable longer term.

"Subgroups inherit permissions assigned to top-level groups. Inherited permission can be removed. You cannot add permissions for subgroups."

When a process has both "Map and Procedure" enable, the toolbar which has the (Summary, Feedback, Change Log, Documents,Targets, Systems, Tag and @Todo) tabs are only visible on the Map view. However when the process only has "Procedure" view enabled, the tool bar is visible in the Procedure view.

Can we make it so that the toolbar is visible in both Map and Procedure view when the process as Display type = Map and Procedure?

Processes are printed with the configured document types displayed as text only e.g. a checklist or form that is required to complete a task step. In order to obtain the form, the user has to return to the process and print the required document. Adding the configured document types as a 'Print Option' will allow the user to select the document type required to complete the process in one step rather than having to return, search and print what is required.

Documents that were linked to an archived process lose their associations and float freely in the system. We need to know when these linked documents would be affected by archiving, and it would be even more helpful to be able to archive them simultaneously if it is shown that they are only linked to the process being archived.

When processes are archived, all data for group associations is lost. We need to know what group any given archived process came from.

Default permission profile for SSO to anything other than "User"

Currently SharePoint does not enable embedding from Promapp without generating the minimode link and including it in iframe code. We encourage users to share processes on SharePoint (e.g. accompanying a news item) and generating iframe code is a bit to advanced for many users. It would be helpful if the iframe code including the minimode link could be generated directly from the Promapp share menu.

There should be a possibility to extract report for several roles simultaneously. Right now, we can only extract the report for a single role from those listed in the options.
However, it would be interesting and appropriate in certain cases to be able to extract a report for multiple roles, since some employees are included in more than one role.

Hi, would be great if you could have parallel decision making points so that one activity that has two decision possible decision points can flow in the diagram

The Governance page of the Dashboard shows the process statistics for the organisation in 6 columns. The 3rd column is titled "OUT OF DATE PROCESSES". It would be more accurate to title this column "PROCESSES OVERDUE FOR REVIEW". The processes have passed their review period without confirmation from the expert or owner that they are still accurate and up-to-date, but that does not necessarily mean they are out-of-date.

Currently we receive a notification when there have been changes, but the email does not specify what the change was.
It would be great when the email is sent, if there is some clear notes as to what specifically has changed. Looking at the email, you can't tell.

during development and reviews of processes there is a lot of feedback that gets discussed and resolved that the PO/PE cannot either hide from view after resolution but also can't delete the thread, they have to keep notifying a promaster which to delete to keep the history view manageable. Additionally, any user trying to see what is currently being addressed gets lost on the litany of already resolved feedback in the Give Feedback panel. This is just far too messy to be useful and time consuming for a promaster who has a lot of other administration to do.

We have the ability in My Dashboard > My Reviews to view published processes which are due for review, but there is no similar function to view processes that have been saved, but forgotten to publish.

Requesting please for an 'unpublished processes' tab to list those that require review

Please integrate the sub-process details in the printing (PDF) of a (main-) process. The result should be a single document for the process, its details plus the integrated sub-processes and their details.
Thank you.

When users consult a process, they can't see if that published version is the last one or if it has a new version that is being edited/approved. This may leave users in doubt as to whether they are actually viewing the version that is to be kept, or whether what they are viewing is out of date or will become out of date in a moment.

It would be helpful if we can see the number of processes available in the folder up front (in the left navigation pane).
I understand that we can generate a report for a specific folder to view the number of processes. At times, it becomes tedious when you need to know for multiple process groups.

You can refer to the attached screenshot for the location I am referring to display the process count.