Process Acknowledgement - wording - "published" rather than "changed" when published by Promaster
As Promaster when publishing processes, process changes to acknowledge states "process has been changed by [promaster name]", it would be preferable to state "process has been published by [promaster name]", I find employees think I am changing the process, where in fact as promaster I am publishing the process, not making the changes.
I agree... whenever any processes change it appears on their dashboard that I am personally authorising the change. This masks the fact all of our process changes undergo a strict governance, review and approval process by Process Owners, Process Experts and our stakeholders.
AdminKerry (Admin, Nintex) commented
Thanks for the feedback. I agree this could be improved, however this isn't on our near-term roadmap. For now we'll open for voting and monitor interest from other clients.