7 - Nintex Promapp

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Bulk archive/delete of processes

    We create processes during training that serve no purpose after the training session. It can take a long time to search for these and archive/delete them one by one. It would be a lot quicker if this could be done in bulk, by searching for processes with a certain name and then selecting the ones you want to archive/delete in bulk.

    125 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  37 comments  ·  Improvement add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Better placement of the Save button

    The save button is in an odd position, and gets overlooked and not very intuitive.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Ability to show decision loops in a process on the Map

    As most Business Process in the world are not just straight linear processes and can have steps that based on decisions or choices made that the process could loop back to an activity that has already occurred in the process or actually skip steps forward. Yes you can make these comments on activities in the form of notes but at a high level if you just look at the mapping of the process you would never see that.

    39 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  10 comments  ·  Improvement add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Add hyperlink to an email address in a process

    In a process we want staff to send an issue to a shared mail box but we are unable to make the email address a hyperlink.

    35 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Improved Functionality for Transitioning Processes between Owner/Experts

    In order to better support transitions in process ownership, whether they are published or in development, I propose the following functionality be added.
    Break the Publish Now feature for Promaster's into 3 separate functions/Button.

    1. Transition O/E- This button would function to transition groups of processes not yet published between owners and experts. It would transition only it would NOT publish. Maintaining process approval structure and not signaling the original owner.

    2. Transition Publish- This button would transition groups of processes that may be in an additional layer of update or development. It would republish the process as an increase of 1…

    57 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  9 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Ability to move opened document images when in Procedure View

    Hi - small enhancement if feasible.

    From the persona of the Promaster, or reader of a process in Procedure view, it would be great to have ability to move around an image you have opened up in an Activity so that you can see the image and the task steps simultaneously.

    When I am doing a quality and usability check for document images the image covers up the task content in the background.

    47 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  5 comments  ·  Documents  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Case sensitive glossary

    It would be good to have a Glossary that is case sensitive. Currently IT (Information Technology) is being tagged every time we use the word 'it'.

    41 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  5 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Increase number of roles able to be assigned to an activity to more than 6

    Currently there is a limit of 6 roles able to be assigned to any activity. This has lead to having to create an increasing number of group roles or responsibilities purely to use for the process e.g. xx requestor, xx approver, etc. I would like to be able to add all of the roles that will perform this action. Creation of additional roles creates an unnecessary administrative burden.

    53 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  11 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Ability to add timeframe across activities.

    Allow a number of days etc. to be prescribed over multiple activities so that an overarching timeline can be allocated. For example from activity 1 through to 10 takes 30 days.

    18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on improving our search and process variation capabilities and delivering sequential approvals. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

  10. Restrict access to a minimode once a process has been archived

    Please can Minimode advise "Sorry, this has been archived, no longer available' message once a Process has been archived.

    Currently it allows access to the archived (empty) Process

    38 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Mass transfer of @TODO (eg. when someone leaves the company)

    When you transfer Ownership (Owner/Expert) of a process, you should also get the option to transfer any @TODO within that process that are assigned to the same person.
    OR
    Facility to transfer @TODO that are assigned to a particular person on mass.

    57 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  7 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. changing owner expert automatically publishing

    There is currently an issue with the system that violates the whole approvals framework.
    Whenever someone leaves the organisation or changes role there is no way to bulk transfer a processes still in development to a new resource without the process automatically being published which then bypasses the approvals process. We are a small organisation and have at least one person join and leave a week. To review all of the processes to see if they are ready for publishing would be an administration nightmare.
    The system needs to be able to be able handle transfering a process in a…

    23 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on improving our search and process variation capabilities and delivering sequential approvals. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

  13. Report on broken links

    It would be extremely useful if Promapp could at the very least produce a report on any broken web links in processes (ie. links to intranet or internet that are no longer accurate or available)

    38 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  4 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Process Review - Reviewed It vs Publishing Changes

    Currently for an 'Out of Date' process:

    If no changes are required, the Process owner/expert will go into their "My Reviews" page, click "Reviewed It" and provide a comment like "No changes required".

    If changes are required, the Process owner/expert will go into the process, make the necessary changes and get it published. However this still required the Process owner/expert to go back into "My Reviews", click "Reviewed It" and provide a comment (which will be the same comment as the comment left for submit for approval).

    Suggestion would be to:
    a.) make the review date be (re)calculated from the…

    42 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  9 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Provide a word 'replace with' function like Microsoft has

    When we re-brand a product name/team name, the name needs to be changed in every single process (mainly notes and tasks). To avoid having to change it in every single process, I would welcome an option like Microsoft has to replace a word with another word in all my processes. It would save a lot of time.

    16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on improving our search and process variation capabilities and delivering sequential approvals. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

  16. Record type of edit when editing a published process

    The ability to choose from a list of 'edit types' when editing a published process eg grammar/punctuation, change of role, major change to activity, minor change to activity

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on improving our search and process variation capabilities and delivering sequential approvals. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

  17. Trigger email sent to owner/experts of dependancies/inputs/outputs when a change to the process occurs

    When a change is made to a process a trigger email should be sent to any Dependancies/Inputs/Outputs process process owners/experts to see if the change effects their process - this would allow end to end thinking and visibility of changes

    39 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. bulk edit / delete roles

    When managing roles, you can only act on 1 at a time. Allowing bulk deletion of role would be super handy.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on improving our search and process variation capabilities and delivering sequential approvals. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

  19. Review all images and documents attached to a process under the process review, rather than separately

    With hundreds of processes requiring review that include 10 or more screenshots or videos (images) it is painfully time consuming going through each item individually for each process. As these images also require a review it creates hundreds of items for review in the backlog.

    As all images, videos, and documents attached to a process are reviewed at the time of the process review it would awesome if when a process is reviewed that all the attachments are considered reviewed and marked as complete at the same time.

    59 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Not Planned  ·  10 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Auto-adjust map view (tab) to screen

    The process "Map" tab or Process Group "Overview" tab should auto adjust to the size of the screen and to the size of the panels around it. Each time I click on the Map tab, I have to zoom out and resize panels in order to see all the activities of my entire map (or in the instance of a Process Group "Overview" tab, to see all the processes in a process group). Can PROMAPP not allow this map view to auto-adjust to any screen and to the panels around it? I think this would increase efficiency by enabling users…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on improving our search and process variation capabilities and delivering sequential approvals. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

← Previous 1 3 4 5 8 9
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base