7 - Nintex Promapp

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. delete variation

    We have global variations which cover our different business units and for the most part our processes apply to all the business units, but for some instances the business unit may not perform a specific process and I would like to remove the specific global variation on those processes. At the moment, I can't delete them due to being global variations. Could you add a feature to allow us to remove (and perhaps add back) global variations?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Started  ·  1 comment  ·  Process Variations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Change log to identify which process variation an entry is for

    For example the if a variation is updated and published separately from the standard the publication change entry does not have the variation listed in the process name, so it is not possible to use the report download to produce an accurate publication date summary report.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Started  ·  1 comment  ·  Process Variations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Enable adding parallel activities in process variation

    I would like to be able to add tasks in parallel in a process version. I can't do this and I can't change in the standard process either once I created variations.
    The point here is to make sense of the process with tasks that start and are carried out at the same time. It is therefore not possible to use notes or a mini process to express this.
    I find that such a restriction really blocks the use of process variations.
    Thanks

    16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Started  ·  8 comments  ·  Process Variations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Declining approval or publishing request by at least one Promaster should return process to draft or edit state

    If a Promaster declines or rejects an item in the approval/publishing queue, the item should be returned to draft/revision state, preferably with a notification to the owner/expert on why.

    Current state is that ALL Promasters must decline/reject item before it disappears from approval/publishing queue. This leaves the item open for accidental approval or publishing.

    33 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Started  ·  9 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Ability to navigate to process from Manage Groups

    One of our staff members has said that they would like to be able to click on a process name from Manage Groups and have that process open. This would help them decide which group to put the process in. Currently the processes are listed, with the ability to copy or archive via right-click, but they are not links to the processes.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Started  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. API reporting capabilities

    Some immediate benefits we are looking for are:
    - Ability to create reporting/ dashboard based on company specific KPI's
    - Ability to combine data from other company systems i.e. Learning Management System into one report/ dashboard
    - Ability to schedule and automatically email reporting

    60 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi all! Sorry for the slow response on this one as well as the delayed release. We will be releasing the Reporting API for Improvements Add on in Sept 2019 and next up will be API for Process data, followed by risk but timing on those is TBD.

  7. Mobile Access

    There is a large need to be able to consume process information on a mobile device while away from a desktop - example: in a factory or plant, maintenance in the field, sales on the road, etc.

    This could be through an app for Promapp or a responsive site that could be more easily consumed on a phone or tablet.

    59 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Started  ·  6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Revert back variations (PVM) to previous versions

    With standard processes you can revert back to a previous version via the change log. That option is not available for variations. I'm not sure why. It should act as any other process.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Improve how folder viewing permissions are managed

    It's very difficult to set up viewing permissions... several steps that are tough to follow and remember. Plus even looking at the indented folder structure just below is nearly impossible to do with naked eye. Plus I think I saw inconsistencies in how parent-child indentation was displayed.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi,

    We have started the redesign of the viewing permission page for improved performance and usability. We’re also implementing adding roles to a permission so permissions don’t need to be applied on a per-user basis.

    Regards

    Kerry

  10. Make the base variation visible (PVM).

    When working with variables if you want the 'base' process to be visible to users you have to make an exact copy of it. This makes maintenance difficult as you must remember to never change the 'copy'. If the process truly is a base process, why wouldn't we want it visible to users?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base