When you transfer Ownership (Owner/Expert) of a process, you should also get the option to transfer any @TODO within that process that are assigned to the same person.
OR
Facility to transfer @TODO that are assigned to a particular person on mass.

With hundreds of processes requiring review that include 10 or more screenshots or videos (images) it is painfully time consuming going through each item individually for each process. As these images also require a review it creates hundreds of items for review in the backlog.

As all images, videos, and documents attached to a process are reviewed at the time of the process review it would awesome if when a process is reviewed that all the attachments are considered reviewed and marked as complete at the same time.

Currently there is a limit of 6 roles able to be assigned to any activity. This has lead to having to create an increasing number of group roles or responsibilities purely to use for the process e.g. xx requestor, xx approver, etc. I would like to be able to add all of the roles that will perform this action. Creation of additional roles creates an unnecessary administrative burden.

Hi - small enhancement if feasible.

From the persona of the Promaster, or reader of a process in Procedure view, it would be great to have ability to move around an image you have opened up in an Activity so that you can see the image and the task steps simultaneously.

When I am doing a quality and usability check for document images the image covers up the task content in the background.

This proposed report would show for each process which other processes are connected to it (linked process, conditional, linked by decision diamond or via notes)

Currently you can see this information for an individual process by going to the dependencies section of that process, but there is not way to generate reports with this information for a group of processes.

Having this report and being able to export its results could aid in developing visual flows of connected processes, aid in change management efforts, and dealing with processes connections prior to archiving.

We create processes during training that serve no purpose after the training session. It can take a long time to search for these and archive/delete them one by one. It would be a lot quicker if this could be done in bulk, by searching for processes with a certain name and then selecting the ones you want to archive/delete in bulk.

Documents cannot be deleted if they are attached to a published process (which is fair) however they also cannot be deleted if they are attached to an unpublished process, which is harder to track down.

This also makes identifying orphaned documents much harder since there are false positives.

Showing the unpublished processes (along with an indicator) would make this much easier.

This request has come up time and time again and pertains to procedure view rather than map view. There are times we'd like to call special attention to viewer to some section(s) and currently it's quite challenging.

When a change is made to a process a trigger email should be sent to any Dependancies/Inputs/Outputs process process owners/experts to see if the change effects their process - this would allow end to end thinking and visibility of changes

It would be good to have a Glossary that is case sensitive. Currently IT (Information Technology) is being tagged every time we use the word 'it'.

Please can Minimode advise "Sorry, this has been archived, no longer available' message once a Process has been archived.

Currently it allows access to the archived (empty) Process

Ability to record a business area with a user as part of their profile so that reporting can be created by business area. At the moment there is no way to work out which business area a user belongs to
i.e. if wanting to report on ‘Promapp Activity’ by business area via
a. Number of staff of the business area that have been set up as a Promapp user

b. Number of staff of the business area that have logged into Promapp
c. Number of staff of the business area that have viewed processes

Review dates should calculate from the date the review is DONE not the day it is due.

review dates should be more flexible - if review is done in the middle of the review period why can't we mark it as reviewed and reset the schedule?

When writing a process with attachments, especially screenshots, it is often not necessary for that image to be added to the documents library. It would be great to be able to tick a box that says this document is not required in the library but is still attached to the process, that way it would reduce image clutter in the library (that really should be for documents) and reduce the amount of reviews required on individual document library items

In a process we want staff to send an issue to a shared mail box but we are unable to make the email address a hyperlink.

RACI on Activities/Tasks:

1. On Activities we can only relate responsible role but not accountable.
2. On Tasks there is no option of mapping any RACI assignments

Recommendation: Transfer the existing functionality on Task level (instead of Activity) and then populate it automatically on the Activity level to create the swimalane

As most Business Process in the world are not just straight linear processes and can have steps that based on decisions or choices made that the process could loop back to an activity that has already occurred in the process or actually skip steps forward. Yes you can make these comments on activities in the form of notes but at a high level if you just look at the mapping of the process you would never see that.