Currently, swimlanes are auto-created every time a new combination of role/responsibility or system is entered into the "assign role" section of an activity.

This creates multiple swimlanes if the same role uses different systems within a process, resulting in a messy process map.

Having system tags in an activity is a useful function, though.

It would be excellent to be able to "switch off" the inclusion of systems as determinants of additional swimlanes.

Would love to promote French up the priority list as a preferred language so that the system could be wider accepted across Canada which is officially a bi lingual country

Identify process steps that has a critical control through a badge on the activity level, similar to how a system tag is displayed.

As the administrator I would like the ability to change the default view of a process map (or have multiple views for different users) to display what is relevant for the viewer. E.g. someone in the field would be interested in seeing just a map or process but not all the other details on timeframes, RACI, review date, etc. where as others may need to see some of that info or all of that info.

Scheduled dates should always be maintained so we can identify if people completed units on time or late. Currently we won't know if a training unit was completed late if they have completed it because the scheduled date is removed when a completed date is added.

Provide an additional field to apply to Promapp reports that track changes made to the owners/experts of processes and documents. Not tracking these changes makes it difficult to provide change of ownership proof to external organisations that approve sensitive processes before publishing.

we would like to export a csv file of the document tags as a reference point for the document owners to allocate tags consistently.

Currently there are Tags for Lean, Document, Timeframe.
It would be helpful if there was the ability to be able to create new categories for Tags e.g. Asset.
Aligned to this would be the need to then have a report that list all processes where the tags are used.

When linking an existing document can we have functionality added to let us refine our search of those existing links by tags or systems they're associated with? We have many different business units (BU) using Promapp so there are hundreds of documents going into the system. It would be ideal for us to be able to search for documents and refine our search by our business unit tag when we are adding them into our processes.

to diversify the way that documents and processes can be searched. can it be made possible to make them searchable by the reference number? not only in the search bar, but when you need to 'attach existing document to a process? Thanks

Enable Portfolio Managers to leave comments or provide feedback on a registered risk, so that their feedback remains visible on Promapp. We´ve had cases where the Portfolio Manager, does not agree with a classification or category for a given risk, and there is no option to leave that feedback inside the tool.

If there is a checklist in the process and the process has been changed to a new version, the checklist should be coming with the process as the process is generally reviewed but not checklist is reviewed as a part of reviewing. Current Promapp provides the version history in the change log but you have click to the version number to see the details. It is creating more steps for a pro master or user to review of the process improvement by adding more admin work. which means it require more time to go over the process.

It would be great to have a configurable option to require users login through SSO prior to accessing a minimode link. This would improve the accuracy of the user view counts and our adoption tracking. Right now, we avoid the use of minimode links because anonymous view counts don't tell us enough.

It would be great to have a report that can be run from Promapp that allows us to see what maps have timings next to them and which do not. This would allow us to use Promapp as a workload management tool

Ability to reassign a feedback to another page. Users are commenting on a Policy page instead of the Procedure page. Our Owners/Experts in some teams are finding that they are redirecting the user to the correct page often and it would be easier to shift the feedback to the right page for them.

Could you make your navigation in Promapp more like the standard MS Windows-style folder navigation? This would make it more second-nature to find things.

Particular problems: 1) The UI uses three "home" buttons (see attachment). 2) It's unclear how to go up a level. Can I also use the browser back button? 3) The tiny links next to the third "home" button are not easily identified as containing folders. Thanks!!

Once a process author/editor is happy with a process they should be able to submit it to the stakeholders for review before it goes to be approved. There would need to be configuration to exclude certain stakeholders such as ALLSTAFF. An idea would be possibly to allow the author to select a bunch of representative individuals to send the process to.

Would be good to have the ability to know and also report on if the person completing the activity successfully completed the activity or if there was a fail / issue. Potentially a drop-down option "Completed well" "Issues" "Failed" etc so that a report could be run and trends identified if there are consistent issues on an activity