There is no way to delegate your approvals when going on annual leave. There is the capability to bulk transfer Process Experts or Process Ownership but updating Additional Approver and Publishers has to be updated by each individual Process

Some immediate benefits we are looking for are:
- Ability to create reporting/ dashboard based on company specific KPI's
- Ability to combine data from other company systems i.e. Learning Management System into one report/ dashboard
- Ability to schedule and automatically email reporting

There is a large need to be able to consume process information on a mobile device while away from a desktop - example: in a factory or plant, maintenance in the field, sales on the road, etc.

This could be through an app for Promapp or a responsive site that could be more easily consumed on a phone or tablet.

This request has come up time and time again and pertains to procedure view rather than map view. There are times we'd like to call special attention to viewer to some section(s) and currently it's quite challenging.

If a Promaster declines or rejects an item in the approval/publishing queue, the item should be returned to draft/revision state, preferably with a notification to the owner/expert on why.

Current state is that ALL Promasters must decline/reject item before it disappears from approval/publishing queue. This leaves the item open for accidental approval or publishing.

Promapp has no true AD connection even with SSO. Using the AD connector and a Promapp connector, be able to set Promapp roles and global variations in a dynamic was. so that when new people get hired they can be automatically provisioned in PROMAPP

It would be great to bulk delete documents. Over time a number of documents have been uploaded and are no longer or were never attached to processes. We would like to be able to bulk delete any unattached processes that have not been viewed in 12 months or more. Searching through and deleting documets one by one is too tim intensive/

It would be helpful to be able to add text beneath a linked process to add context or specific instructions within a wider process.

It would also be useful to be able to edit the name of the process to fit in to the wider process that it's linked within.

To improve glossary functionality I propose the following.
1. There should be a data type called acronym as part of the glossary.
This should be case sensitive. This would allow for the organization to set its own acronyms and thus ensure effective use.
2. allow for users to have mulitple instances of an acronym. POC- Proof of concept, point of contact, . Allowing the process writer to designate a definition.
3. If there are dominant definitions within Promapp instances, for example APQC, SAP, BPM, these could be part of a larger glossary function to help share concepts across multiple organizations.

Perhaps this is just rookie error but my colleagues and I have had very difficult time figuring out all the the linkages between processes and process groups that need to be undone in order to archive and delete. I suspect there could be better prompts or automated breaking of links

We have the ability in My Dashboard > My Reviews to view published processes which are due for review, but there is no similar function to view processes that have been saved, but forgotten to publish.

Requesting please for an 'unpublished processes' tab to list those that require review

When you have set up training in the system and people have completed the training, but have changed role and no longer require refresher training there is no way of archiving that persons training record for the training unit so instead it shows as expired until such time that person leaves the business or the complete refresher training. It would be great to be able to archive them so the training evidence is still in the system but not physically visible. This is important especially for KPI reporting for training and overdue training.

When using a decision diamond the process ends in two different places, which each have a distinct output. Unfortunately when entering an output there is no way to define which part of the process produces that specific output. The map shows both outputs flowing from both ends of the process.

Even if staff search our document library to check whether a link has already been created, they are unable to see the attachment type (ie form, guide, information, training, policy), so when they then go to attach the existing link to their process they sometimes select a different attachment type and then their search doesn't locate the document (even though they know it's there!)

If the attachment type is visible in the document library their frustration levels will be reduced.

Sharing processes is the great strength of Promapp, but we still find that some experts/owners get confused about who can/cannot see processes that are not yet published.

Quite regularly I will get requests for "access" to Promapp which are actually requests for an draft process to be published. Because the user get an "access denied" error, it appears to be about permissions. A more helpful message would be something like "this process has not yet been published so is hidden to avoid confusion. Contact the process expert and/or owner for an update." then list the owner and expert.

It would be great if Promasters were able to create their own reports in their tenant. If we could select the data/fields we want to pull statistics from and filter as we need we could leverage the data more.
Would especially be good to filter more available reports too.

There are instances when process editors overlook resolving @TODO items prior to submitting processes for approval. It would be helpful if the system could prevent the submission of processes while there are unresolved @TODO items present. Perhaps when the user goes to click 'Submit for Approval' a window could appear advising that there are unresolved @TODO items and call out where in the process these are.