7 - Nintex Promapp

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. More detail in Status column of the Process List report

    It would be great to have more detail in the Status column of the Process List report. Currently there seems to be only Published or Unpublished. I'd like to see 'Awaiting Approval' or 'In Progress' rather than 'Unpublished'. That way it would reflect the status as shown in the process itself (next to the title).

    19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  4 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Improved wording and explaination in error messages

    It would be fantastic if there were a variety of error messages instead of the generic "Whoops that wasn't meant to happen" and "Contact your Promaster" error messages.

    Current when users come across those error messages they will contact the Promaster and provide a screenshot, however the message is so vague that it can be incredible difficult for the Promaster to trouble shoot before determining whether it needs to be escalated to Nintex Promapp as a bug. It would be great if the error message included a description of the type of error or a code of some sort etc.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. SAML - Attribute Based Assignment possible

    We are shifting to AzureAD as our Identity and Access Solution. We have been told your product doesn't support Attribute-Based Assignment.

    The assignment of users should be able to be completed using with attribute-based functions Example expression:
    AAD Group = "MarketingUsers" then added to Promapp role “Marketing”

    Users can then be assigned the correct roles when they join or move teams automatically instead of the manual process which involves a delay to the user and a waste of admin time in provisioning and in UAR (user access review)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Ability to have notes on conditional process links

    Currently we use the notes functionality to manage conditional processes because we don't have the ability to describe the condition criteria applicable. Could we have a text field added to the conditional process field, so that we could define the applicable condition e.g. 'Follow this conditional process when..."

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Enable 2 separate role allocation lists in the user profile (primary & secondary roles)

    Having the ability to allocate roles in 2 separate lists would enable roles to be allocated as a primary role or roles i.e. main job, and secondary role or roles i.e. interested in, which would effectively be a means to 'subscribe' to process notifications.

    The secondary role could be controlled by the user themselves as well in the User management page.

    The content of the notification email could be segregate by primary and secondary roles so the user can see which updates affect them directly and those that they have an interest in.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Add more fields to the user data

    Add more fields to the user data to enable differentiation between users with the same or similar names. This extra data should be displayed in the various user selection fields.

    Suggestions are (in no particular order): Job Title, Location, Department.

    In a company of 5000+ employees we have many occurrences of people with similar names (e.g. Andrew Smith or Andy Smith) and it is impossible know which is the one you want to pick in the various user selections fields.

    Also, we use SSO and we have found that any 'extra' info we manually add to the name fields is…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Publication Declined should revert new process to Unpublished instead of In Progress

    A new Process is in PAW (revision 0.xx) and Awaiting Publish. Once declined and back into editing state, it lists as In Progress. Instead, it needs to revert to Unpublished because the process has not been previously published. This inaccurate label confuses reporting.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Add Automated/scheduled Reports

    Add option to automate sending of various reports such as Process overdue for review or approvals. Allow to outline report groups that receive an automated report to confirm overdue task are not being missed.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Process reviews should not need to be republished

    When processes are up for review they often don't need any changes. At present we are forced to make a minor change (ie. add a space somewhere) just to trigger the approval process to remove the process from the review cycle. This also updates the version which should not be necessary. It would be great to see an option to acknowledge the process has been reviewed and mark it as complete without having to republish.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Function to turn off automated checklist emails

    Please develop functionality for a checklist based setting that enables or disables automated emails from a checklist as the tasks are completed.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Improvement add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Ability to archive groups

    When we have archived all documents and processes within a group and an empty group remains, we are unable to delete or archive the group due to the content connected to it in the archive.

    We would like to have an ability to archive a group where it is empty of current content.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Clearer text in relation to Decision points

    Have had a request from one of our staff members - if you are reading the procedure text, rather than looking at the process map, it's a little confusing when you come to a decision point.

    Your options if you are linking to an activity as your yes or no are NEXT ACTIVITY and CONTINUE. It is not all that clear which bit is the next activity and which bit is the continuation (particularly for new users).

    The suggestion is that the text be clearer e.g. GO TO ACTIVITY 5.0, so you can tell exactly where to go. I know…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Selection boxes for Risk rating

    Please add selection boxes to the Risk rating selections to allow us to include the additional custom ratings we add to either to Residual and/or Inherent Risk rating calculations. In our example we added a rating called Velocity which we would like to apply to both the Residual and Inherent risk calculations, whereas something like Control effectiveness would only apply to the residual risk calculation. At the moment, with velocity only calculated as part of the Residual wisk value, our residual risk is showing as higher than the inherent risk.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Risk add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Improve unsuccessful search functionality

    It would be great to pull a report on the words users search so that we can see if the process titles or key words need to be changed to help users find the right processes.
    Would also be good if the search didn't find any matches to provide suggested search terms (similar to Google)

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Allow the entering of other costs to get more complete view of total cost of process

    We are able to get cycle cost now, by adding time to activities and assigning the role to the activity. But that doesn't cover all the costs that may be associated with a process. Would be nice to be able to enter other costs as well, such as software cost, storage at Iron Mountain, etc. This would allow us to get a more complete view into the total cost for that process.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Correlate the Out of Date Processes 'donut' number with the linked report

    The report generated by clicking 'View Report' on the Total Processes donut (on either the Governance Dashboard or at the bottom of the Promapp homepage) does not reconcile with the number shown on the donut.

    Promapp have confirmed this is because the donut counts each process only once, whereas the report includes entries for shortcut processes (ie a process that has shortcuts is counted multiple times).

    This is very unhelpful when reporting to management.

    When running the Process Review Dates report from the Admin) Reports menu there is no option to exclude shortcuts.

    I recommend the report linked to the…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Show input/trigger and output title in map view

    We notice that staff rarely look at the inputs and outputs because in the map view it doesn't show what the specific input/output is, and in the procedure view the input is listed at the end of the process activities. Therefore our inputs/trigger information is mapped as Activity 1 in most processes.

    Suggestion to improve this: the green input/trigger box show the activity name - as it does for each activity in the body of the process. Likewise for the output box.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Process Acknowledgement - wording - "published" rather than "changed" when published by Promaster

    As Promaster when publishing processes, process changes to acknowledge states "process has been changed by [promaster name]", it would be preferable to state "process has been published by [promaster name]", I find employees think I am changing the process, where in fact as promaster I am publishing the process, not making the changes.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. Multiple outputs when using decision diamond

    When using a decision diamond the process ends in two different places, which each have a distinct output. Unfortunately when entering an output there is no way to define which part of the process produces that specific output. The map shows both outputs flowing from both ends of the process.

    25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base