Hi - is it possible to change how decision points work so that both yes and no actions (when complete) can join on to the same path? It is very common in process mapping tools for this to be the case.

In the attached file, action 3.0 could connect to action 4.0 instead of another "Outputs"

thanks

is there anyway that we can add a select button in the summary screen to close numerous incidents at once rather then closing every incident individually

Similar to the Risk Module, there should be an option to import improvements following a template. We have the need with our quality and compliance team to upload "history" to Promapp and the only way we are able to do this is manually one by one, instead of being able to use a massive upload funcitonality.

Process editors for a sub-group used to be independent of the parent group. Sub-group permissions now inherit Process Editors from the parent group, which can be contrary to required functionality. To manage this requires an increase in the number of subgroups with all processes in subgroups to enable control at each level, a greater admin overhead.

Please integrate the sub-process details in the printing (PDF) of a (main-) process. The result should be a single document for the process, its details plus the integrated sub-processes and their details.
Thank you.

Our company has its Document management system and we do not want users to save it somewhere else. However for Process and Procedures, it is useful if videos or images can be uploaded against the Activity or Task. Currently, Promapp only allows upload of all document types but not by type (e.g. allow only image and video types but restrict any other type of document like excel, word, powerpoint or pdf)

When it comes to lean tags there is a lot of workarounds and it is not user friendly at all. When producing a lean tag report the link to the process should be included, like with other reports, it is not when you save it into Excel, only when in the PDF view. When you have 1,000s of lean tags that need to be sorted the Excel view is the only option. Please add process links to the export.

It would be helpful if we could be able to restore historical versions of Standard maps as well as the variations from the change log. At the moment we can only revert back to previous releases on stand alone maps.

Currently, only processes can be referenced to a process via the Input field. It would be helpful if documents that are associated with a process - but not with a specific activity - such as a RACI, a Glossary, a Policy etc. could be linked in the Input field.

Documents attached to processes that are moved to another group should not remain in the original group or provide an option to select 'remove from this group'. With organisational restructures, processes can be moved and the extra work required to remove each individual document from the original group so any obsolete groups can be deleted is time consuming!

Currently there is a dis-joint with the addition of Process Group approvers. The Process Group Champion needs to ask a Promaster to add them. Being the Group Champion, they should be permitted to add their approvers themselves

1. Extend search functionality to include risk owner field (currently only picks up risk description & treatment description) in /Risk/Register

2. Enable search within /Dashboard/MyRisks (i.e. as is provide in /Risk/Register)

Include the choice to search all pages or filter to Processes I'm In - so that the Processes I'm In capability is intuitive and not hidden.

We have a Process Dashboard but a new pivot could be to also have as user dashboard.

This dashboard could be sortable by timeframe. It could show total users that accessed the tool during the time frame, processes viewed, unique users each days in that time frame. This would make it easier to present data.

When you have a decision, you can set it to go to next activity, another process or add in another activity completely but it can only be one activity with multiple tasks. Would like to be able to add at least another additional activity. Find we add heaps of details to the tasks/notes and it can become messy. There’s not enough to warrant a whole new process but too much to fit into just the one activity

Process roles such as Process Owners and Process Experts are universal but a Process Group Champion isn't. I'd like to see Nintex Promapp provide the ability to rename the title of this role please. We may have an established role title in the business that has similar responsibilities that we want to apply to Promapp or just may not find the term "champion" appropriate. Cheers

It would be great to be able to see peoples names when hovering over a role within a process for quick access on knowing who to contact for a certain task without having to hop out and look at the org chart.

When not using SSO it would be advantageous to see failed login attempts.
Anecdotally some users have forgotten their password and as a result are just not using Promapp at all, rather than getting a reset.

When there are duplicate documents in the library, I want to merge them so that there is only the latest version or one source of the truth.
Documents can be uploaded more than once if the person does not search for it first and/or uses a slightly different name (do not follow naming conventions) i.e. they include a prefix or use a space in it somewhere or add a date or typo.