Current, Risk Score = Likelihood x max{ Severity(1), Severity(2), Severity(3)..}

This understates the risk quantum where multiple domains of severity are hit. Please add additional scoring methodology as follows:

Score = Likelihood x { Severity(1) + Severity(2) +…}

When adding active or wait times to a set of parallel activities, only the largest time allocation is included in the process total. For example, if active time for 1.1 = 5 minutes, 1.2 = 25 minutes and 1.3 = 10 minutes, only the time on 1.2 is included in the process total. This seems somewhat counter-intuitive for analytics. It captures the overall process run time, but doesn't reflect the total staff time spent on the process.

I would like linked processes in a minimode to open in a new browser window rather than changing within the same window. This also disables the back arrow so that you can not go back to the original promapp. I understand that this is due to the URL not changing.

The search bar in Processes I'm In only searches titles (if I'm correct). It would help a lot if it also searched keywords and content as well.

We use the Improvement module to track workflow for incidents/events. It would be nice to see some form fields that are activated as a condition of response to a prior field. This would make the event submission experience cleaner for the user.

We use the Improvement module to track workflow of incidents/events. Similar to how we are able to required certain form fields at submission and assignment, it would be helpful to designate the required fields that must be not null before closing the form.

It would be helpful to be able to add text beneath a linked process to add context or specific instructions within a wider process.

It would also be useful to be able to edit the name of the process to fit in to the wider process that it's linked within.

I am finding alot of Groups in our structure that are void of processes. A report showing the Groups structure (groups within groups) and listing the processes, their status (published/unpublished/in progress), version number and the Process Owner and Process Editor would enable a rationalisation of the Group structure and clean out of obselete Groups

I often have the need to use the same activities across processes, I am aware of the export / import text from procedure option. Having a 'copy activity' option, that copies all the detail in an activity, in the cog wheel of each activity would save a lot of time

To remove a system from Promapp, first you must remove system tags by going into each process and removing them manually. This means from each activity, task, and note.
If you have a number of processes where a system appears in, this is a significant amount of work, before you can remove something that may be obsolete, or incorrect.

I suggest, as each system has an owner, a notification for system removal would go to them, and they would review and delete the system, if applicable.

This proposed report would show for each process which other processes are connected to it (linked process, conditional, linked by decision diamond or via notes)

Currently you can see this information for an individual process by going to the dependencies section of that process, but there is not way to generate reports with this information for a group of processes.

Having this report and being able to export its results could aid in developing visual flows of connected processes, aid in change management efforts, and dealing with processes connections prior to archiving.

Please see all details in the word attachment including our business workflow. I have had a call with Tanzim as it was initially thought there is a workaround for this but there is not.

Under a group of processes, currently there is only the option to link all processes or to keep them unassigned thus not linked. Our business need is to avoid having numerous sub-groups and have the option to assign a chain of processes to a swimlane and have under the same group another chain of processes which to be assigned to another swimlane running independently.

It has been brought to my attention, by a colleague who is colour blind, that they have struggled with the colours used in Promapp.

I would like to request appropriate changes to improve accessibility for colour blindness.

Below are some articles for reference about the use of colour:
http://web-accessibility.carnegiemuseums.org/design/color/

https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/quickref/?showtechniques=141#use-of-color

Many thanks for your assistance on this matter.
Michelle

Process Views by User Report. As this has the potential to be a large report if run over more than a day or so, it would be useful to be able to filter by user / users prior to exporting to excel.

As ProMapp knows my ID via a login why cant Promapp autocomplete some repetitive details.
For example when I am adding a new process I will be the Assigned Officer in each step.
If in some cases that is not true then it would be easier to delete one entry better than adding each step

Nintex Promapp is only set to work in English. This is a problem found when working with the browser in another language, Portuguese for example.

Portuguese use commas instead of dots. In timeframes, this doesn't work. If the language is set to English it works.

So when this sends to you using the comma you do not read it correctly as it is not an accepted format.

You should consider adapting the platform to all formats, in this case, comma, dots... etc, according to the browser languages.

Thank you !

The new left hand display for feedback still requires further work.

Viewing historic feedback was actually better through the previous display. Especially when trying to give auditors a full picture of feedback, response and whether it is resolved.

It is not clear in the new display if something is resolved or not.

It also isn't intuitive where the historic feedback is located. As you have it hidden behind a button that is titled 'Give feedback'