Processes are printed with the configured document types displayed as text only e.g. a checklist or form that is required to complete a task step. In order to obtain the form, the user has to return to the process and print the required document. Adding the configured document types as a 'Print Option' will allow the user to select the document type required to complete the process in one step rather than having to return, search and print what is required.

When processes are archived, all data for group associations is lost. We need to know what group any given archived process came from.

I would like an easy way to turn off variations in a process - i.e. click a button to have the standard version become the only process and all variations removed. Especially when there have been no changes.

Hi, would be great if you could have parallel decision making points so that one activity that has two decision possible decision points can flow in the diagram

We have global variations which cover our different business units and for the most part our processes apply to all the business units, but for some instances the business unit may not perform a specific process and I would like to remove the specific global variation on those processes. At the moment, I can't delete them due to being global variations. Could you add a feature to allow us to remove (and perhaps add back) global variations?

It would be good to have reports available for exporting for onboarding/training statistics.

Currently SharePoint does not enable embedding from Promapp without generating the minimode link and including it in iframe code. We encourage users to share processes on SharePoint (e.g. accompanying a news item) and generating iframe code is a bit to advanced for many users. It would be helpful if the iframe code including the minimode link could be generated directly from the Promapp share menu.

Currently you can only attach one document to an incident action, there is no way to attach more documents as evidence of the action having being completed.

Currently an incident action cannot be deleted once the action is completed. If someone creates an action with an error and mistakenly completes it, it can not be removed from the incident, the only workaround is deleting the whole incident and create a new one, which would affect all involved parties. Promasters should be able to delete them

There should be a possibility to extract report for several roles simultaneously. Right now, we can only extract the report for a single role from those listed in the options.
However, it would be interesting and appropriate in certain cases to be able to extract a report for multiple roles, since some employees are included in more than one role.

We have a dedicated Change Process in our organisation that sits outside of Promapp. We would like to be able to disable the feedback feature so that people must use the correct channel. Perhaps there is already an option, but I could not locate it. Many thanks

The Governance page of the Dashboard shows the process statistics for the organisation in 6 columns. The 3rd column is titled "OUT OF DATE PROCESSES". It would be more accurate to title this column "PROCESSES OVERDUE FOR REVIEW". The processes have passed their review period without confirmation from the expert or owner that they are still accurate and up-to-date, but that does not necessarily mean they are out-of-date.

Currently we receive a notification when there have been changes, but the email does not specify what the change was.
It would be great when the email is sent, if there is some clear notes as to what specifically has changed. Looking at the email, you can't tell.

we are finding that our users are creating a lot of similar processes in Promapp that are really just variations of a single process flow, and would like to be able to have promasters be able to select multiple processes to combine together. Once that is done, they can label the merged processes as variations to keep one workflow

improve visibility of process maps with vertical responsibility swimlanes instead of horizontal

A scoring scheme for the risk register that includes the following five options:

· Inherent likelihood
· Inherent consequence
· Control effectiveness
· Residual likelihood
· Residual consequence

The current manual residual scoring scheme does not have anywhere to record the control effectiveness.

during development and reviews of processes there is a lot of feedback that gets discussed and resolved that the PO/PE cannot either hide from view after resolution but also can't delete the thread, they have to keep notifying a promaster which to delete to keep the history view manageable. Additionally, any user trying to see what is currently being addressed gets lost on the litany of already resolved feedback in the Give Feedback panel. This is just far too messy to be useful and time consuming for a promaster who has a lot of other administration to do.