One of our staff members has said that they would like to be able to click on a process name from Manage Groups and have that process open. This would help them decide which group to put the process in. Currently the processes are listed, with the ability to copy or archive via right-click, but they are not links to the processes.

Some organisations consider control and treatments as seperate things.

Reporting availability on user addition and deletion by Promasters.

[ ref:00D90q6Cb.5002v2cbjHX:ref ]

We notice that staff rarely look at the inputs and outputs because in the map view it doesn't show what the specific input/output is, and in the procedure view the input is listed at the end of the process activities. Therefore our inputs/trigger information is mapped as Activity 1 in most processes.

Suggestion to improve this: the green input/trigger box show the activity name - as it does for each activity in the body of the process. Likewise for the output box.

Introduce the ability to move processes between process groups within 'Manage Groups'. This would provide a better flow when moving through the options.

While writing the Processes, I realised I should make groups and processes within the groups, now no way is to copy or move these processes in newly created Groups

When a checklist is discarded it cannot be reopened. Another team member discarded my current checklist.

When requesting a process to be archived we need the ability to provide some explaination to the approvers as to why it is being archived

Scheduled dates should always be maintained so we can identify if people completed units on time or late. Currently we won't know if a training unit was completed late if they have completed it because the scheduled date is removed when a completed date is added.

Currently if you set up an onboarding plan for someone you automatically become their owner. Not useful to centralise this activity. Please allow admins to set the onboarding owner and the new starter so we can set up onboarding plans on behalf of managers.

Provide an additional field to apply to Promapp reports that track changes made to the owners/experts of processes and documents. Not tracking these changes makes it difficult to provide change of ownership proof to external organisations that approve sensitive processes before publishing.

When linking an existing document can we have functionality added to let us refine our search of those existing links by tags or systems they're associated with? We have many different business units (BU) using Promapp so there are hundreds of documents going into the system. It would be ideal for us to be able to search for documents and refine our search by our business unit tag when we are adding them into our processes.

Is there an option to change the email address when someone uses the 'Email Process' option (showed in attachment) to the individual's email address rather than 'promapp-noreply@promapp.com.au'?

It would be great to pull a report on the words users search so that we can see if the process titles or key words need to be changed to help users find the right processes.
Would also be good if the search didn't find any matches to provide suggested search terms (similar to Google)

It would be great to have more filters to customise risk reports

I would like to be able to see completed checklists in the process view - can currently only see active checklists.
yes we can see them in the all checklists area, but there is no ability to filter these by process group

The 'Process Approval Workflow Status' report currently provides a published/unpublished status for processes. It would be helpful if this report could include more detail of the exact stage of approval that the process is in, rather than 'unpublished', and also who has provided what approvals and whose are outstanding (see example attached of our manual workaround).This is particularly useful information for onboarding clients who will have a large amount of unpublished processes at first.

The ability to choose from a list of 'edit types' when editing a published process eg grammar/punctuation, change of role, major change to activity, minor change to activity