7 - Nintex Promapp

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Expiring processes

    Can there be a better email notification system to notify users via email about their expirced processes for example on a monthly basis?

    This would make sure that we don't have to manually reach out to the Process OWners and Experts each time when a process is expired and the user is not checking his/her own dashboard. This ensures that all processes would be kept up to date due to higher awareness of the expirey.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Share innovative ideas

    Email users links to interesting innovative Promapps where non-standard ideas have been used so as to inspire creativity.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Allow qualitative only risk ratings

    Currently you have to enter quantitative values to provide a risk rating number and level. Could there be an option to just have a level, even if in the background you had to use quantitative values the display would just be high, medium, low etc. The other rating criteria can then be the indicator for flagging the risk for follow up. For example if you have a high risk, with deficient control effectiveness but you had agreed it can be managed outside of the target level this would not flag for additional follow up that can be set up in…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Risk add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Include Filters on ALL Risk Module Reporting

    Currently the Audit History Report does not include any indication of what it refers to when exporting to PDF. As a stand alone document this makes it worthless and I would guess not ISO 9001 compliant? It would be useful if all the filters (especially the portfolio name and date parameters) were included.

    Worst case scenario if you had to present evidence of reasonably practicable efforts to manage risk, this may not be usable.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Risk add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Import Systems list

    Would be great if you could upload a list of systems to promapp. I was expecting to be able to export a list, update it and upload it.

    Our architects have recently recoded all of our systems and would be great if we didn't have to do this manually.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Ability to toggle add-on modules on and off

    As Promasters, we'd appreciate having the ability to toggle add-on modules on or off w/ respect to larger system audiences seeing them as option within top level menu. This would allow us to use them behind the scenes for experimentation purposes. Currently it appears to be all-or-nothing which is rough. Either everyone sees them (and it's a confusing experience for end users at best) or no one sees them (including Promasters!) once a Nintex admin is pulled in to remove them. A middle ground is direly needed.

    I could see Business Analysts being lumped into this special view access as…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Risk Review dates

    As we can determine the control assessment due date individually in the Risk module, I would like to be able to determine the risk review date individually. Not all risk reviews are due at the same time. To give a person this flexibility opens the opportunity to include more risk reviews and controls as different business units can manage their own risks.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Risk add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Make the edit pencil more visible

    Promapp users who aren’t actively involved regularly often are getting confused with the blue ‘’EDIT’’ selection under the investigation tab. Because the edit selection is more visible than the edit pencil and being on the investigation tab, they’re clicking that button in attempt to edit the investigation and are instead directed to the action tab if they have actions.

    I have two improvements:
    1st: make the edit pencil more visible and;
    2ndly: Amend the blue ‘’Edit’’ to ‘’Action’’ or remove this option completely – if they wish to action they will view the action tab which will immediately take them…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Visibility of improvement Module register in intranet

    We want to embed our ideas portfolio register (no the form to report an idea) in our intranet. So staff are able to see what ideas have been reported and the status of these ideas.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Improvement add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Change description: Ability to amend wording prior to publishing

    When a change is submitted for approval, the wording in the change description is locked from that point onwards during the PAW. If the change description wording does not accurately reflect the changes made, the Process Expert/Process Owner/Publisher currently must decline the submission entirely and the submitter has to resubmit the changes with an accurate description. It would be helpful to have the option for roles in the PAW to be able to amend the wording in the change description up until the point of publishing.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Training tags - allow use of existing system tags

    Allow existing system tags in Promapp to be used for Training Tags

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Add version number in the "to approve" and "to publish" list

    Having the version number in the "to approve" and "to publish" list enables the publisher and approver to establish whether or not this is the first time a process is coming though the approvals process and as such prioritise these above ones which are just being changed.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Customise Menu item

    I would like to be able to change Help> Contact Promaster to Contact (My company name) Promaster.
    Staff have said they thought that by clicking the Contact Promaster option it would send a message to Promapp / Nintex. They did not realise it would contact the in house SME, which is what they wanted to do.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Streamline @todo's

    Currently to type it up and assign to someone else, it's a 3-step process. this frustrates our editors and owners/experts. Prefer it to be single step similar to how this is done within Google docs

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Ability to configure the message bulletin to be limited within the Process Group

    For relatively large organisations, it could be chaotic when everyone starts posting messages on the bulletin board. Would be great to have the ability to limit the visibility of the messages to the process group level so users only see messages that are relevant to them.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. QR codes

    Are there any plans to introduce QR codes for processes?

    We’ve got a request to set up a promapp process for charging an electric vehicle, and I’m thinking of best ways to set this up for users.
    Having a QR code on the dashboard that links to the process would be a very useful option!

    Rather than all promapp users producing their own QR codes, I wonder if Nintex could set this up for all to use

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Option to make feedback only visible to Owner/Expert

    An option (like a tick box) for the person submitting feedback to only make it visible to expert/owner (and promasters).

    This may encourage more honest feedback if they know it's not going to be seen by the rest of the Promapp community (in our case, all employees).

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Display when Improvement Restricted

    You can restrict an entry in Promapp Improvement Module, however you cannot see if an entry is restricted unless you go into the entry. Display on the register summary when an entry has been restricted. Make it easily identifiable when an entry/improvement has been resticted

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Improvement add-on  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. Promapp Courses linked to Promapp user Access Levels

    Loving the Learning Central Promapp content and currently using this as a method of onboarding our users and writers.
    Would be great to have an Adfmin User visibility to see who has logged in, completed courses etc.
    Would be handy as a way of gauging competency when providing users with access.
    Even better if it could then link to the users in Promapp only allowing higher access once relevant courses have been completed.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. When process is in progress the default view should be the published rather than the draft

    We have had feedback that if person has editing status, they would still like to see the published version as the default view when they click on a process. because there is a risk that unapproved process is used rather than the published. Although you have editing rights, does not mean you are the one actually doing the editing.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base