7 - Nintex Promapp
-
Ability to filter Processes Awaiting Approval by Approver
Ability to filter Processes Awaiting Approval by Approver in order to facilitate sending a report to each approver. Ideally, an automatic report that would be sent to each approver after x number of days of not being approved but could be manually filtered and sent in the meantime
13 votes -
Singapore Data Center
Most of the government or large commercial customers will not go for Promapp unless we have a data center in Singapore. Does Nintex have any plans of hosting Promapp in Singapore Data Center ?
12 votes -
Ability to add text/note beneath a linked process
It would be helpful to be able to add text beneath a linked process to add context or specific instructions within a wider process.
It would also be useful to be able to edit the name of the process to fit in to the wider process that it's linked within.
29 votes -
Remove Contact Support
Allow me to hide the Contact Support under the Help menu. I don't want the general user contacting Nintex Support. Many times they are asking a question about a process that Nintex can't answer or they are reporting an issue that should be vetted through the Promasters or our internal help desk first.
6 votes -
Move Triggers and Inputs section on Procedure to the top
Wouldn't it make sense for the 'Triggers and Inputs' section to be at the top rather than at the end of the procedure. They are supposed to support the user experience by providing information on what triggers the process yet most users would not know to scroll to the end of procedure to see them. A trigger starts the process, so it makes sense for it to be at the beginning.
10 votes -
Indicate when a note or task exists within activity step
Ability to visually allow the reader to know that there is further detail under an activity like a task or note. Either by color of activity or some marker. Users do not inherently know to review the dialog box or procedure and may miss key information.
15 votes -
Add report for all processes by role keyword
Often times we need to together the processes by a specific department. This will include several roles (ie Purchasing - Contract Admin, Purchasing - Buyer, etc). At a minimum, I would like to see a report that can search on role keyword to be exported to Excel with minimode links. I would really like to be able to print this package of processes to be able to provide to an executive leader, as they generally prefer to get the pdf version in a packaged manner.
12 votes -
Automatic Publish after first version
Posting on behalf of Anthony at Nhshire
They would like approval process for first publish and then the option for subsequent publishes to just go through.
This is so authors follow the correct guidelines. Once those are guidelines, are met they do not require approval subsequent publishes.
3 votes -
Process experts and process owners need to be able to import processes, not just promasters
At present, only promasters can import processes from other organisations who are sharing them with us. This is a waste of time, especially as we are encouraging process experts and process owners to drive their promapping and make contact with other organisations for promapping help.
3 votes -
Different colour settings for different page types
To make it more obvious whether our users are viewing a procedure or policy page (and we have a third variation too) we would like to have a difference in formatting - such as the header being in a different coloured bar.
3 votes -
Add share button next to results in search
In addition to the favourite button, it would be great to have the share process link button show up when searching. I often need to provide links to a number of processes and having to go into each one to get the link is a bit frustrating and slow, this would definitely make it more efficient!
2 votes -
Published process
A user shouldn't be able to see search key words, this should just be a back end functionality. It makes it more confusing when searching for a process because it adds unnecessary text.
A published process should have the linked inputs at the top and also linked outputs at the bottom. From a user end the owner, expert, background, triggers, inputs, outputs, RACI.. doesn't add value to them and if they're in map view they can't really see this. Would it not make sense to have them as back end screens
If they have a problem with the process they…3 votes -
Add a View Only Privilege Type
It would be good to have a 4th privilege option added to make the limiting of process creation easier to manage. Currently to have a view only user type you need to switch on the "limit process creation to PM, BA and PC" option in config which then means that you need to add users to the PC role in each process group manually.
It would be much easier to have a privilege available where view only access can be set at the user level rather than managing process creation user by user in each process group.
4 votes -
Publish All Button
It would be nice to have a Publish All button to publish all of the process maps in a group at the same time.
2 votes -
Report to visualize the RACI matrix for each role
Make it possible to extract a report for each role where its RACI is evidenced.
This report would allow us to see for which processes a certain role is responsible, is consulted, is a stakeholder, etc.2 votes -
Add 'Process Writer' field so writers can receive notifications
Our business has process writers that write on behalf of SMEs and Owners. They do not receive notifications when there is feedback provided nor when processes are ready for review. If there was a Process Writer field they would be able to receive notifications and see all feedback sent through for them to action or acknowledge
3 votes -
Enable multiple types of tags (e.g. Lean AND timeframe) to be shown on the map at once
As we increase in process maturity more users would like to use active/wait timeframes and lean tags. At the moment only one tag can be shown on the map at a time. It would be great if you could select more than one (e.g. active AND wait times, active time AND lean, lean AND system) rather than toggling between options.
This is particularly important for the staff undertaking Lean Six Sigma training and improving processes.
13 votes -
Enable permissions to be added to sub-groups
There needs to be a way to add permissions to sub-groups so that we can set up consultants with access when they need to work with a specific team without giving them access to all of the processes.
I understand this would be a structural change but the current workaround of making the process group a top-level group isn't really viable longer term.
"Subgroups inherit permissions assigned to top-level groups. Inherited permission can be removed. You cannot add permissions for subgroups."
1 vote -
Have the tool bar (Summary, Feeback, Change Log etc. tabs) visible on the Procedure Tab
When a process has both "Map and Procedure" enable, the toolbar which has the (Summary, Feedback, Change Log, Documents,Targets, Systems, Tag and @Todo) tabs are only visible on the Map view. However when the process only has "Procedure" view enabled, the tool bar is visible in the Procedure view.
Can we make it so that the toolbar is visible in both Map and Procedure view when the process as Display type = Map and Procedure?
19 votes -
Process Maturity Tagging
Process maturity is an indication of how close a developing process is to being complete and capable of continual improvement through qualitative measures and feedback. Thus, for a process to be mature, it must be complete in its usefulness, automated (where appropriate), reliable in information and continuously improving.
In order for an organisation to understand it’s process maturity, having the ability to audit and tag a process to categorise it to show what stage, tier or level of maturity a process is at. This will provide visibility and reporting on the organisations process maturity. This also provides focus for improvement…5 votes
- Don't see your idea?