7 - Nintex Promapp

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Ability to configure settings based on use purpose (Project v Governance)

    Configuration setting do not cater for different use purposes i.e. A project team has different configuration requirements to business as usual process management.

    An example is the review approval workflow. If this is switched on for BAU it would cause problems for projects as Project Managers would be constantly getting update reminders.Being unable to separate also prevents use of the dashboard as it encompasses all processes in Promapp.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Default permission profile for SSO to anything other than "User"

    Default permission profile for SSO to anything other than "User"

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Enable permissions to be added to sub-groups

    There needs to be a way to add permissions to sub-groups so that we can set up consultants with access when they need to work with a specific team without giving them access to all of the processes.

    I understand this would be a structural change but the current workaround of making the process group a top-level group isn't really viable longer term.

    "Subgroups inherit permissions assigned to top-level groups. Inherited permission can be removed. You cannot add permissions for subgroups."

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Publish All Button

    It would be nice to have a Publish All button to publish all of the process maps in a group at the same time.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Optimize print capabilities

    Processes are printed with the configured document types displayed as text only e.g. a checklist or form that is required to complete a task step. In order to obtain the form, the user has to return to the process and print the required document. Adding the configured document types as a 'Print Option' will allow the user to select the document type required to complete the process in one step rather than having to return, search and print what is required.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Report to visualize the RACI matrix for each role

    Make it possible to extract a report for each role where its RACI is evidenced.
    This report would allow us to see for which processes a certain role is responsible, is consulted, is a stakeholder, etc.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. When users consult a process, they can't see if that published version is the last one or if has a new version that is being edited/approved

    When users consult a process, they can't see if that published version is the last one or if it has a new version that is being edited/approved. This may leave users in doubt as to whether they are actually viewing the version that is to be kept, or whether what they are viewing is out of date or will become out of date in a moment.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Add a favourite heart in My Changes > Process Changes tab.

    We've had user feedback that when they read a process change and think that they want to add it to their favourites, they can't do this easily - they have to go into the page and then favourite.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Highlight feedback requiring response when viewing feedback tab on process

    Highlight feedback requiring response when viewing feedback tab on process

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. search field is not standing out in new look.

    With the new look Promapp, the search field in the documents module and in the improvements register does not stand out as the icon is small, and the field only pops up if clicked on, plus is the same colour as the surrounding page.. Could the search field be made more obvious? people always use the "process and document' search field above then get lost.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Linked processes in Minimodes open in a new browser window

    I would like linked processes in a minimode to open in a new browser window rather than changing within the same window. This also disables the back arrow so that you can not go back to the original promapp. I understand that this is due to the URL not changing.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Add more fields to the user data

    Add more fields to the user data to enable differentiation between users with the same or similar names. This extra data should be displayed in the various user selection fields.

    Suggestions are (in no particular order): Job Title, Location, Department.

    In a company of 5000+ employees we have many occurrences of people with similar names (e.g. Andrew Smith or Andy Smith) and it is impossible know which is the one you want to pick in the various user selections fields.

    Also, we use SSO and we have found that any 'extra' info we manually add to the name fields is…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Front page search All or Processes I'm In

    Include the choice to search all pages or filter to Processes I'm In - so that the Processes I'm In capability is intuitive and not hidden.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Add Automated/scheduled Reports

    Add option to automate sending of various reports such as Process overdue for review or approvals. Allow to outline report groups that receive an automated report to confirm overdue task are not being missed.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Clearer text in relation to Decision points

    Have had a request from one of our staff members - if you are reading the procedure text, rather than looking at the process map, it's a little confusing when you come to a decision point.

    Your options if you are linking to an activity as your yes or no are NEXT ACTIVITY and CONTINUE. It is not all that clear which bit is the next activity and which bit is the continuation (particularly for new users).

    The suggestion is that the text be clearer e.g. GO TO ACTIVITY 5.0, so you can tell exactly where to go. I know…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Being able to filter between overdue Processes and over due Documents

    Currenty on the "My Reviews" tab, you can see items which are Overdue, due in 3 months and due in 12 months.

    It would be great if we could expand the selection of filters by:
    - Adding a filter for Type i.e. Documents, Processes, Policies so our time poor Process Owners can focus their energies on the type of content which is higher risk
    - Adding flexible time filters - being able to filter by overdue, 3 and 12 months is great but if our owners want to see whats due in the comming month or comming 6 months they…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Improved wording and explaination in error messages

    It would be fantastic if there were a variety of error messages instead of the generic "Whoops that wasn't meant to happen" and "Contact your Promaster" error messages.

    Current when users come across those error messages they will contact the Promaster and provide a screenshot, however the message is so vague that it can be incredible difficult for the Promaster to trouble shoot before determining whether it needs to be escalated to Nintex Promapp as a bug. It would be great if the error message included a description of the type of error or a code of some sort etc.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Ability to change ordering of Systems under Map view

    Systems are currently ordered alphabetically when selecting the 'Systems' option within the map view of a process.

    Is it possible to add a feature where a user could choose to order them by 'Step(s)' instead?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Reference field in User Profile

    One of our analysts has requested a user reference field in the user profile. This would allow us to cross reference with another system using employee number.
    You could even have phone number and a way to download a nice contacts list.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Prevent users being disabled if they are a PO or PE

    It is currently possible to disable users when they are a PO/PE.
    There is no warning to tell you that you need to reassign their process ownership/expert responsibilities. Then when you go to reassign their processes as Process Owner, if the Process Expert is also disabled, it is not possible to reassign the PO.

    A few solutions:
    1) Prevent users being disabled if they are a PO or PE
    2) Warn the Promaster that they should be reassigned first
    3) Allow a PO to be reassigned even if the PE is disabled and vice versa.

    Please remember that Promasters leave…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base