7 - Nintex Promapp

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Notifications for Reviews

    Recommend adding a configuration option to email owners and experts when a process requires review with the ability to set an advance notice (e.g. an email notification to be sent 1 week or 1 month in advance of a review due date).

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Allow archive or delete of feedback by PO/PE

    during development and reviews of processes there is a lot of feedback that gets discussed and resolved that the PO/PE cannot either hide from view after resolution but also can't delete the thread, they have to keep notifying a promaster which to delete to keep the history view manageable. Additionally, any user trying to see what is currently being addressed gets lost on the litany of already resolved feedback in the Give Feedback panel. This is just far too messy to be useful and time consuming for a promaster who has a lot of other administration to do.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Show approvers in ''Submit for Approval" dialogue

    When sending a process for approval, the user can enter a short explanation of what has changed and why. Understanding your audience is key but there is nothing on this screen to show who the approvers are.

    To identify the approver the user has to exit this dialogue and go back to the process and check both the summary tab (for expert and owner) and RACI (for additional approvers). This still won't show any approvers added by the group Stakeholders.

    Only once the process has gone for approval is it clear who

    Request is to add a list of who…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. accessibility improvement for colour blindness

    It has been brought to my attention, by a colleague who is colour blind, that they have struggled with the colours used in Promapp.

    I would like to request appropriate changes to improve accessibility for colour blindness.

    Below are some articles for reference about the use of colour:
    http://web-accessibility.carnegiemuseums.org/design/color/

    https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/quickref/?showtechniques=141#use-of-color

    Many thanks for your assistance on this matter.
    Michelle

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Planned  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Have an 'internal feedback' option between PE/PO

    Have an internal feedback option for collaboration and workflow that is not published/available to the rest of Promapp users.

    This could be used for work in progress processes and collaboration. A user could either leave comments/review notes for updates/suggestions during improvement sessions.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Planned  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Publication Declined should revert new process to Unpublished instead of In Progress

    A new Process is in PAW (revision 0.xx) and Awaiting Publish. Once declined and back into editing state, it lists as In Progress. Instead, it needs to revert to Unpublished because the process has not been previously published. This inaccurate label confuses reporting.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Process reviews should not need to be republished

    When processes are up for review they often don't need any changes. At present we are forced to make a minor change (ie. add a space somewhere) just to trigger the approval process to remove the process from the review cycle. This also updates the version which should not be necessary. It would be great to see an option to acknowledge the process has been reviewed and mark it as complete without having to republish.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. When creating a process, have additional approvers as part of the approval workflow

    When creating a new process, even if you have delegated an additional approver to be part of the workflow, they are not 'counted' or brought in until it has been published at least one.

    As they are noted as part of the workflow, they should review/update changes from the start.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Improving the automatic dashboard notification email

    Would we improve the look and feel of the automatic dashboard notifications include:
    - Allowing us to customise the messages which appears
    - Extend the hyperlink in the email to either the entire box or also the number in the coloured, not just the text (please see attached image).
    Currently the hyperlink is only clickable if you click the words "Process Changes" or "Document Changes", however I am finding that users are trying to clicke the number in the colour box, or just the box area in general.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Groups: Produce report on list of groups

    My business wants to be able to see the list of groups (with or without processes) so we can identify the groups (business functions) that still need mapping. The reports allow for the export of process lists but not a list of process groups. There is absolutely no way to do an audit on the process groups without it being done one at time. Not efficient at all.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Modify Ownership & User Rights Report to Include Process Writers not Editors of Groups

    We are trying to track who is actually writing processes (published and unpublished) and there is no report that shows that or dashboard view for the Promaster. We can export to show process editors but it is useless and only shows editors of a group not processes, and those people have the rights to approve a process - not sure why a process editor would have the rights to approve a process.

    Our writers do not approve the process. Only the SME & Owner is responsible for that.

    Therefore, we have no way to report on who is actually writing…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Process Maturity Tagging

    Process maturity is an indication of how close a developing process is to being complete and capable of continual improvement through qualitative measures and feedback. Thus, for a process to be mature, it must be complete in its usefulness, automated (where appropriate), reliable in information and continuously improving.
    In order for an organisation to understand it’s process maturity, having the ability to audit and tag a process to categorise it to show what stage, tier or level of maturity a process is at. This will provide visibility and reporting on the organisations process maturity. This also provides focus for improvement…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Parallel decision making points

    Hi, would be great if you could have parallel decision making points so that one activity that has two decision possible decision points can flow in the diagram

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Add an option to generate iframe code to embed minimode in SharePoint under the sharing menu

    Currently SharePoint does not enable embedding from Promapp without generating the minimode link and including it in iframe code. We encourage users to share processes on SharePoint (e.g. accompanying a news item) and generating iframe code is a bit to advanced for many users. It would be helpful if the iframe code including the minimode link could be generated directly from the Promapp share menu.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Ability to have notes on conditional process links

    Currently we use the notes functionality to manage conditional processes because we don't have the ability to describe the condition criteria applicable. Could we have a text field added to the conditional process field, so that we could define the applicable condition e.g. 'Follow this conditional process when..."

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Bulk Delete / Multi Delete of Glossary Items

    It would be very handy to allow for bulk delete / multi delete of Glossary items. We imported a spreadsheet of words/terms from a corporate dictionary, but after seeing how well Promapp tags things - we're really wishing we could easily remove large chunks of what we uploaded - or remove it all and do a more targeted upload.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Improved functionality to search/assign responsibilities and roles

    When assigning a responsibility or role in the "Select Role" popup, there is no easy way to search other than scrolling down what is a rather large list.
    It would be good if there was a way to quick search the name of the role that would then filter only those that match the desired search term. This would save a lot of time.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Planned  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Reporting - Process List Report

    Ability to filer the Process List Report by Process Owner / Process Expert prior to exporting to excel.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Disable Autocomplete on Promapp

    Not really a feature but more highlighting a current issue we are experiencing (but was asked to post it here by Nintex Support).

    Currently Promapp has Autocomplete enabled on the site, so whenever a user tries to create a new process the 'Process Owner' and 'Process Expert' fields are both mapped to 'name' for autocomplete.
    If the user ends up clicking their name when autocomplete is shown, this causes Promapp not registereing the user as it was entered as plain text.

    This is something we come across every single training session we hold (as part of the training session we…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Escalation Matrix for Process Approval Workflow

    Within Process Approval Workflow it would be great if we could add an escalation matrix so that if an approver does not action in X amount of time, this then gets escalated to someone else and if they don't reply in X it gets escalated to Y and so forth

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base