Currently there is a limit of 6 roles able to be assigned to any activity. This has lead to having to create an increasing number of group roles or responsibilities purely to use for the process e.g. xx requestor, xx approver, etc. I would like to be able to add all of the roles that will perform this action. Creation of additional roles creates an unnecessary administrative burden.

Being able to add a Process Group as a favourite would make working much more efficient as I wouldn't have to constantly navigate through specific pathways to get to the process group I am working in.

It would be extremely useful if Promapp could at the very least produce a report on any broken web links in processes (ie. links to intranet or internet that are no longer accurate or available)

There is no way to delegate your approvals when going on annual leave. There is the capability to bulk transfer Process Experts or Process Ownership but updating Additional Approver and Publishers has to be updated by each individual Process

When adding tasks to an activity you are required to scroll up to the top of the activity to add a note or attach/link a document. If the system would freeze the task bar at the top of the screen so the functionality was always available that would allow for easier use. This could be set up similar to the Add Activity, Add Process Link functionality that currently exists.

Currently it appears that when you update a process title, it doesn't automatically update the title if it is linked inside another process. Sometimes, to update this, you need to delete the process link and re-attach it so that the correct title name shows.

It would be great if the system could automatically update the titles of processes linked within other processes.

When a change is made to a process a trigger email should be sent to any Dependancies/Inputs/Outputs process process owners/experts to see if the change effects their process - this would allow end to end thinking and visibility of changes

When you transfer Ownership (Owner/Expert) of a process, you should also get the option to transfer any @TODO within that process that are assigned to the same person.
OR
Facility to transfer @TODO that are assigned to a particular person on mass.

When requesting a process to be archived we need the ability to provide some explaination to the approvers as to why it is being archived

There are instances when process editors overlook resolving @TODO items prior to submitting processes for approval. It would be helpful if the system could prevent the submission of processes while there are unresolved @TODO items present. Perhaps when the user goes to click 'Submit for Approval' a window could appear advising that there are unresolved @TODO items and call out where in the process these are.

With hundreds of processes requiring review that include 10 or more screenshots or videos (images) it is painfully time consuming going through each item individually for each process. As these images also require a review it creates hundreds of items for review in the backlog.

As all images, videos, and documents attached to a process are reviewed at the time of the process review it would awesome if when a process is reviewed that all the attachments are considered reviewed and marked as complete at the same time.

For decisions on a Process map it is obvious which Activity the "Yes" and "No" alternatives point to; however in the text description (the 'Procedure') it is less clear, and can be confusing for those users who prefer to read text without referencing the map.

It would be helpful if the text description could be expanded to include the IDs of the Activities for the 'Yes' and 'No' alternative paths.

Documents cannot be deleted if they are attached to a published process (which is fair) however they also cannot be deleted if they are attached to an unpublished process, which is harder to track down.

This also makes identifying orphaned documents much harder since there are false positives.

Showing the unpublished processes (along with an indicator) would make this much easier.

This request has come up time and time again and pertains to procedure view rather than map view. There are times we'd like to call special attention to viewer to some section(s) and currently it's quite challenging.

Review dates should calculate from the date the review is DONE not the day it is due.

review dates should be more flexible - if review is done in the middle of the review period why can't we mark it as reviewed and reset the schedule?

Reporting availability on user addition and deletion by Promasters.

[ ref:00D90q6Cb.5002v2cbjHX:ref ]

Add a "back" button that will also users to click through linked processes and get back to where they started. With breadcrumbs turned off, there is not efficient way for end users to walk through a complex process.

Ability to separate image approvals from document approvals. We had document approvals switched on, but found our approvers were getting inundated with approval requests for images, which are predominantly screenshots to attach to tasks. It would be handy if you could have document approvals turned on but image approvals turned off.