Currently there is a limit of 6 roles able to be assigned to any activity. This has lead to having to create an increasing number of group roles or responsibilities purely to use for the process e.g. xx requestor, xx approver, etc. I would like to be able to add all of the roles that will perform this action. Creation of additional roles creates an unnecessary administrative burden.

It would be extremely useful if Promapp could at the very least produce a report on any broken web links in processes (ie. links to intranet or internet that are no longer accurate or available)

Allow a number of days etc. to be prescribed over multiple activities so that an overarching timeline can be allocated. For example from activity 1 through to 10 takes 30 days.

Being able to add a Process Group as a favourite would make working much more efficient as I wouldn't have to constantly navigate through specific pathways to get to the process group I am working in.

When adding tasks to an activity you are required to scroll up to the top of the activity to add a note or attach/link a document. If the system would freeze the task bar at the top of the screen so the functionality was always available that would allow for easier use. This could be set up similar to the Add Activity, Add Process Link functionality that currently exists.

When you transfer Ownership (Owner/Expert) of a process, you should also get the option to transfer any @TODO within that process that are assigned to the same person.
OR
Facility to transfer @TODO that are assigned to a particular person on mass.

Please can Minimode advise "Sorry, this has been archived, no longer available' message once a Process has been archived.

Currently it allows access to the archived (empty) Process

When a change is made to a process a trigger email should be sent to any Dependancies/Inputs/Outputs process process owners/experts to see if the change effects their process - this would allow end to end thinking and visibility of changes

There is no way to delegate your approvals when going on annual leave. There is the capability to bulk transfer Process Experts or Process Ownership but updating Additional Approver and Publishers has to be updated by each individual Process

It would be good to have a Glossary that is case sensitive. Currently IT (Information Technology) is being tagged every time we use the word 'it'.

When requesting a process to be archived we need the ability to provide some explaination to the approvers as to why it is being archived

There are instances when process editors overlook resolving @TODO items prior to submitting processes for approval. It would be helpful if the system could prevent the submission of processes while there are unresolved @TODO items present. Perhaps when the user goes to click 'Submit for Approval' a window could appear advising that there are unresolved @TODO items and call out where in the process these are.

The ability to choose from a list of 'edit types' when editing a published process eg grammar/punctuation, change of role, major change to activity, minor change to activity

It would be good to have the ability to set target date for each activity, plus reminder when overdue (Same as risk module)

With hundreds of processes requiring review that include 10 or more screenshots or videos (images) it is painfully time consuming going through each item individually for each process. As these images also require a review it creates hundreds of items for review in the backlog.

As all images, videos, and documents attached to a process are reviewed at the time of the process review it would awesome if when a process is reviewed that all the attachments are considered reviewed and marked as complete at the same time.

Documents cannot be deleted if they are attached to a published process (which is fair) however they also cannot be deleted if they are attached to an unpublished process, which is harder to track down.

This also makes identifying orphaned documents much harder since there are false positives.

Showing the unpublished processes (along with an indicator) would make this much easier.

Review dates should calculate from the date the review is DONE not the day it is due.

review dates should be more flexible - if review is done in the middle of the review period why can't we mark it as reviewed and reset the schedule?

We are having some issues when trying to access the checklist to view on mobile phones. The window doesn't 'resize to fit a mobile phone as we expect it to.

Reporting availability on user addition and deletion by Promasters.

[ ref:00D90q6Cb.5002v2cbjHX:ref ]