It would be great if Promasters were able to create their own reports in their tenant. If we could select the data/fields we want to pull statistics from and filter as we need we could leverage the data more.
Would especially be good to filter more available reports too.

Ability to filter Processes Awaiting Approval by Approver in order to facilitate sending a report to each approver. Ideally, an automatic report that would be sent to each approver after x number of days of not being approved but could be manually filtered and sent in the meantime

Currently you can only have 1 expert and owner. You should be able to have at least 2 experts, as some processes are cross functional so it's useful to know who to ask.

Additionally you should be able to have a 'department' or group as the owner and within that you can have multiple people able to sign off. You don't require all to sign off just one of them.

Most of the government or large commercial customers will not go for Promapp unless we have a data center in Singapore. Does Nintex have any plans of hosting Promapp in Singapore Data Center ?

When creating new users we should be able to manage their group access rights in the same window. Going to the Manage Groups section after creating new users takes up way too much time and is often forgotten.

Allow me to hide the Contact Support under the Help menu. I don't want the general user contacting Nintex Support. Many times they are asking a question about a process that Nintex can't answer or they are reporting an issue that should be vetted through the Promasters or our internal help desk first.

It would be helpful to be able to add text beneath a linked process to add context or specific instructions within a wider process.

It would also be useful to be able to edit the name of the process to fit in to the wider process that it's linked within.

Often our staff only want to see the details of the step of the process that they are responsible for. They don't need to read the process steps for other teams in the process. We would like to be able to provide a hyperlink that goes directly to a section of the process. We would like to be able to use this link in the Sharepoint embed webpart.

Wouldn't it make sense for the 'Triggers and Inputs' section to be at the top rather than at the end of the procedure. They are supposed to support the user experience by providing information on what triggers the process yet most users would not know to scroll to the end of procedure to see them. A trigger starts the process, so it makes sense for it to be at the beginning.

Ability to visually allow the reader to know that there is further detail under an activity like a task or note. Either by color of activity or some marker. Users do not inherently know to review the dialog box or procedure and may miss key information.

We recently Re-indexed our the name and definition of an CRM we sunset recently with the name of the new CRM we implemented.
While the tags on th particular Activities changed, the utterances or references within th process content itself did not change...great to have an option to re-index the system tags within the task content.
We'll have to catch these on our annual process reviews, or have to get teams to commit to manually doing this.

When printing the procedure to PDF, Can we have an option for the process map to be either portrait or landscape. If portrait orientation was selected, the process map would scale to fit the page, making it more user/reader friendly.

While in the Edit mode for a process, it would be more convenient to have or display the current timeframes values right there on the Activities while in Edit mode versus having to change screens and clicking into a dedicate page to read and data enter timeframes.

Even the ability to display and read the current timeframes value on an activity while you are editing tasks would be nice. Better would be to read and write.

Better user experience, usability and less clicking to get work done.

Any one else feel the same?

Often times we need to together the processes by a specific department. This will include several roles (ie Purchasing - Contract Admin, Purchasing - Buyer, etc). At a minimum, I would like to see a report that can search on role keyword to be exported to Excel with minimode links. I would really like to be able to print this package of processes to be able to provide to an executive leader, as they generally prefer to get the pdf version in a packaged manner.

My organisation does not use this field at all so it would be good to have the ability to remove this from our Organisation's Dashboard.

Posting on behalf of Anthony at Nhshire

They would like approval process for first publish and then the option for subsequent publishes to just go through.

This is so authors follow the correct guidelines. Once those are guidelines, are met they do not require approval subsequent publishes.

Many users are forgetting to tick this button when leaving feedback.

As far as I can tell - the feedback then shows in your feedback dashboard with a green symbol next to it. When it is green it does add to the count of feedback items to be completed and does not appear on my email to remind me to update this feedback.

At present, only promasters can import processes from other organisations who are sharing them with us. This is a waste of time, especially as we are encouraging process experts and process owners to drive their promapping and make contact with other organisations for promapping help.