5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Integrate sign-in/sign-out information between SharePoint Online and NWC

    Since this is critical and urgent that affects our NWC implementation, can you please consider the feature improvement?

    Currently, since the sign-in/sign-out system between SharePoint Online and NWC is not integrated, user information still remains in NWC even after s/he signed-out from SharePoint Online.
    When Single-Sign-On (SAML2.0) is available, we need the user to be signed-out from NWC if s/he had signed-out from SharePoint Online.

    31 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately we will not be proceeding with this suggestion as this is not how single sign on operates.

    The sign out is of the application and the application’s active session is unique to the application you’re signing into and out out of. i.e. for any application that you configure SSO for, the sign out action taken on one application is specific to the application.

  2. SharePoint InfoPath Idea

    Is there a way to show the Nintex Cloud Icon in SharePoint and have it work like InfoPath, so when you click on it, while in your list, it opens in Nintex Cloud and creates the form automatically with the fields?

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Form Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback on a nice to have capability for our review. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on new form controls, data source variables, etc. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning. ​

  3. Allow storage on NWC for logo images for use in Forms.

    It would be good to be able to upload an image from my local machine for use in Forms direct to NWC rather than use image sharing or my public website (which is often a svg and not supported image).

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Form Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on providing other features such as additional controls, data source variables, etc. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning. ​

  4. Add the ability to "lock" a list item against a workflow so that only one instance can run concurrently

    Add the ability to "lock" a list item against a workflow so that only one instance can run concurrently per list item.

    If you are running a sharepoint online trigger, this would be a great addition.

    At the minute, sharepoint online modified on triggers can fire multiple times, unless you immediately update the item with a field to stop the trigger. This can be problematic when multiple workflows need to be triggered against an item at the same time, as the multiple immediate update item actions will conflict.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Connor, thanks for the suggestion – the lock you’re describing here already exists and for most scenarios it does not trigger another workflow.

    There’s a workaround this which is to use separate connections for the start event and action. You’ll then need to configure the start event with a condition to filter out on the user used in the action’s connection.

    If this is still a challenge, please let me know and we can have a chat.

    In the future we will look to make distinct connections for start event and actions and by default the start event will filter out events that were triggered by the connection used for actions.

  5. Energie und Umwelt - Nicht bei jedem Vorhaben Relevant, und Umbenennung des Dokumentes im Workflow

    1. Was mache ich, wenn mein Vorhaben keine Checkliste für Energie und Umwelt benötigt? Ich benötige eine Kostenfreigabe für einen externen Dienstleister und habe jetzt einfach ein Liste mit nur "Nein" hochgeladen und einer Anmerkung, dass das Dokument keine Relevanz hat für meine Vorhaben
    2. Evtl. Umbenennung bei des Abfragedokumentes für Energie und Umwelt auf den Namen des Dokumentes im Kompass:
    3. Checkliste Energie- und Umweltaspekte F 007 -
    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Change Which User Posts in Teams from Post in a Teams Channel Action

    When you use the Post to a Teams Channel it will send the post as the person who setup the Teams connector.

    Currently there is no feature to change who sends this post from within the action.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Like other actions in NWC, the post to teams action runs under the context of the connection to ensure the person making the post has the correct level of permission. Unfortunately there is nothing we can do to change this one..

  7. Orientation Time Card Update

    I’m requesting an update to the orientation time card regarding the “Number of Attendees” drop down. Currently, it only goes to seven. I would like that to be increased to 20. I have recruiters that have opportunities to host up to 20 New Hires at one orientation, and the limitation on the dropdown requires them to complete three of these forms. The redundancy can be eliminated via the increase of attendee numbers with the drop down.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Ability to change/customize the sender email address in Nintex Workflow Cloud.

    When you send an email in Nintex Workflow Cloud, all the emails will be delivered by nintex@workflowcloud.com and we are looking to change this email with one of our own email addresses/domains < noreply@mydomain.com>.

    157 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you very much for your feedback, we’ve had many requests for this capability however Nintex will always require its own managed email service to process incoming express approval responses as well as ensuring all emails are reliably delivered.

    Please note that you can already specify the senders display name however the actual from address will always be from workflowcloud.com

    At this stage we are passing on this particular idea as it does not align with the core product mission and roadmap. We welcome additional ideas and feedback from you in the future.

  9. Trim deleted or disabled user accounts / SSO

    Would be nice if there was an auto trim (or flag for action) for users in user manager that are no longer valid or disabled in Azure AD

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Action Set - Elevate Permission

    Would like to have a feature to elevate permission for users that do not have sufficient permission.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Atomic operations in Action Sets

    For parallel path execution, please add a checkbox to the Action Set called "Enable Atomic Operation" - Any actions contained within the Action Set will execute without switching to another parallel branch. There are many scenarios that would benefit from this.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The actions in the parallel branches execute in parallel within the engine v2.

    It’s not executing each action at a time across the branches in a round robin pattern.

    Please reach out if I’ve misunderstood the suggestion.

  12. Create a more accessible bug reporting.

    There is a bug with NWC Repeating Fields where a Number field will not conditionally populate a value from a previous form-variable based on a rule.

    This same action can be accomplished using normal fields in groups, but not in a repeating field.

    Reproduction steps:
    1. Start a workflow with a form containing a number field
    2. create a new form task containing a number field and a repeating control which contains another number field
    3. create a Form rule in the second form which will copy the value of the number field from the Start form if it isn't…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Form Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Not Planned  ·  Euan Gamble responded

    If you feel there is a defect, please raise a support case.

    Cheers,
    Euan

  13. Unsubscribe

    How do i cancel my subscrition and profile, this app does offer what am looking for.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Create New Item on SharePoint List Action to be created by end user not connection account

    When using the "Create New Item" workflow action to create a new line item on the relevant SharePoint List it would be helpful if it could create the item by the person who submitted the form for authenticated users (internal staff/users). This would allow you to set specific views on the SharePoint list for created by only so users can only see what they submitted.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Not Planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Clone a channel in MS Teams

    Please add one more action to the MS Teams connector: Clone a channel in MS Teams.
    We use a hidden channel as template for each subproject and all we need is to clone that template channel to the new channel based on a user request from a list form. Thanks a million!

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Not Planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Not Planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Dashboard Experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Static IP for Nintex Workflow Cloud

    Please consider purchasing a static ip for your cloud service.

    see https://azure.microsoft.com/en-in/updates/static-public-ip-addresses-available-for-azure-virtual-machines/

    To open up our databases/api's to Nintex to access we will need to add the full Dynamic Azure Ip range. ( The list is very long ).

    see
    https://community.nintex.com/t5/How-To-s/Nintex-Online-Services-IP-Addresses-to-Whitelist/ta-p/83587

    It would be very difficult to enter and maintain as the list changes in most instances.

    Thanks

    15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. Online Payments

    Would be great if there was some sort of off-the-shelf payment gateway setup to allow for online payments within a Nintex Form. Would be even more awesome if we could manipulate variables such as cost price via form rules.

    24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Form Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on other priorities. However, we re-evaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

  19. Search option at the workflow dahsboard

    many partners and customers have asked me if it is possible to include a search within the workflow overview. If a customer has 1,000 workflows in the overview as an example, he has to search for them manually today and that costs the user too much time. In Promapp we have this search function. We were also asked whether the overview could be sorted by name, for example, as in Windows Explorer.

    If these two options were possible, this would be another USP for the users and of course for us

    Thanks for your feedback

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Dashboard Experience  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you very much for your suggestion. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the backlog as there isn’t sufficient market demand to warrant consideration.

  20. Form Submission Limits

    There are forms that we would like verified users to only be allowed to submit once during a time frame. This would be like Nintix Live has where you can allow a list of users or all users to submit a form but give them a limit of how many times they can submit the form for processing. This has been helpful in setting up forms for say a voting or survey process.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback on form submission limits for our review.

    At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on other improvements such as accessibility, localization, forms extensibility and reusability.

← Previous 1 3 4
  • Don't see your idea?

5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base