5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Integrate sign-in/sign-out information between SharePoint Online and NWC

    Since this is critical and urgent that affects our NWC implementation, can you please consider the feature improvement?

    Currently, since the sign-in/sign-out system between SharePoint Online and NWC is not integrated, user information still remains in NWC even after s/he signed-out from SharePoint Online.
    When Single-Sign-On (SAML2.0) is available, we need the user to be signed-out from NWC if s/he had signed-out from SharePoint Online.

    31 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately we will not be proceeding with this suggestion as this is not how single sign on operates.

    The sign out is of the application and the application’s active session is unique to the application you’re signing into and out out of. i.e. for any application that you configure SSO for, the sign out action taken on one application is specific to the application.

  2. In Designer convert Assign a Task to a Assign a Task to Multiple Users

    Often times the initial requirements of workflow are to assign a task to one person, but often for testing purposes and discovery lead to a task that has been initially designed as a single user task that now needs to be a multiple user task. It would be great to easily convert the existing single user task into a multiple person task. This would save a lot of reconfiguration time especially if variables are used further down the workflow. It would also be value added for testing purposes.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Not Planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Add support for Signing Groups in DocuSign connector

    DocuSign has a feature called "Signing Groups". This feature allows you to create a group containing multiple users, and the group can be set as the signer. This helps account for situations where a number of people are able to sign a document, but only one signature is needed. It also helps when a user may be out of the office for some reason, and a backup could fill the signing role.

    I suggest that the DocuSign "Get Signature" action be updated to support the signingGroupId field. When this field is supplied, the Recipient Email field should not be required.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for your request to enhance the DocuSign connector to support Signing groups. At this time, we will not be adding this to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on other important features across Nintex Workflow Cloud.


    Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

  4. Separate publish slots for Dev and Prod

    Would be very useful to have the ability to publish a workflow to both Dev and Prod, or ideally publish to Dev -> Promote to Prod.

    Right now when publishing to Dev when a Prod exists overwrites the Prod with the Dev, which is far from ideal, and makes testing changes to existing workflows harder than they need to be.

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback on separate publishing slots for dev and prod workflows for our review. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

  5. Be able to save a Workflow as a Template

    using the Center of excellence model, we would like to be able to provide users Templates to use that we build and test and then save to be used by user in the future but also export or share to other tenants within our license environment

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Restrict future dates in Date/time control

    The date/time control in NWC includes an option for 'Restrict past dates', but it would also be helpful to have the alternative to this and allow us to restrict future dates as well.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Form Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback on restricting future dates on date/time control for our review. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on other highly requests enhancement in Repeating Sections, Choice Multiple, Accessibility, etc. that are obviously critical and more important.  Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

  7. Assign a task without email notification

    Give the option to assign a task without emailing the assignee(s).
    With the addition of my nintex, some users are already asking for the option to just monitor their tasks in there on a daily basis rather than receive emails for each task.

    If multiple users are assigned it would be good to chose who gets the email and who doesnt. This would be particularly useful to send a notification to a shared inbox and allow users of that inbox (also assignees) to complete the task as their users.

    22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for the idea for which we’ve already logged in our backlog.

    Currently we have other near term priorities however we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change.

  8. Assign DocuSign access codes in a workflow

    It would be great if we could assign an access code for a DocuSign Envelope within a nintex form.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for your request to enhance the DocuSign connector to support Access codes.

    At this time, we will not be adding this to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on other important features across Nintex Workflow Cloud. 


    Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

  9. Ability to Integrate with Microsoft Teams Approvals app

    It would be great if there was a connector to connect to the Microsoft Teams approval app to be able to set up approvals within Teams from NWC, with the ability to add form variables into the details field of the approval.

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Powershell via Nintex Gateway

    It would be nice to leverage the Nintex Gateway to execute powershell or command line scripts to interact with on-prem resources. This would allow similar to AzureAD functionality for environments that are more hyrbid focused.

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback on Nintex Gateway for our review. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on higher priority enhancemest on Nintex Enhancements and there are alternative solutions to run Powershell via RPA as noted. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.

  11. SharePoint InfoPath Idea

    Is there a way to show the Nintex Cloud Icon in SharePoint and have it work like InfoPath, so when you click on it, while in your list, it opens in Nintex Cloud and creates the form automatically with the fields?

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Form Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback on a nice to have capability for our review. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on new form controls, data source variables, etc. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning. ​

  12. One response per user

    Sometimes it would be useful to limit responses to one per user. For instance, as I write this we are using NWC to take a survey of all employees (or at least those who will respond), and it would be nice if NWC could prevent a user from submitting more than one survey. I don't have reason to suspect this will happen, but still it would be nice to have the option. Our previous forms software had this capability.

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Form Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Due to low number of votes, low demand and other higher priority feature enhancement requests, we will not pursue this capability at this time.

  13. Allow storage on NWC for logo images for use in Forms.

    It would be good to be able to upload an image from my local machine for use in Forms direct to NWC rather than use image sharing or my public website (which is often a svg and not supported image).

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Form Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on providing other features such as additional controls, data source variables, etc. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning. ​

  14. Filter Data Lookup with real time data from another control or variable

    1) Need to be able to add a condition or multiple conditions to a Data Lookup control that is connected to a MS SQL Server On-Prem Data Source, in order to filter returned results.

    For example: I have two MS SQL Server on-premises data sources; each connected to separate tables in the same database. The two tables have a common key (ID). Unfortunately, the data sources do not give me the ability to filter using real time data at the data source(s) itself.

    I want to use data lookup 1 to find the desired item by its ID in Tbl1…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Form Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you very much for posting your feedback.

    1. You can use the result of one lookup to filter another,  datalookups  return text however, so if you are trying to filter an id field you will need to convert to a integer(see attached).
    2. Data source variables are designed for when you need to return multiple properties(https://help.nintex.com/en-US/nwc/Content/Designer/DataSourceVariables.htm). This should allow you return the information needed. We are looking at objects for data lookups as well.
    3. Data source variables can also deal with mutliple results, while not ideal it's possible to modify the collections and display the data in the fields using variable functions.

    At this time, we will not be adding showing DSV's in repeating section to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on adding additional connector support. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is…

  15. PDF support for Form field "Image" in NWC

    PDF support for Image link in NWC

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Form Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Ability to build or get submitted form URL

    The ability to get the URL of the form submitted. We have two scenarios,

    1. We need to send a link to the original form through the task. this eliminates the requirement for us to recreate the whole start form again (No Export import capability which makes things even harder).

    2.We need the capability to use this link on a PowerBI dash board for reporting purposes so the management can see the summary of the data through the dashboard and view the full form by clicking the line item from the report?

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Form Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Due to low number of votes, low demand and other higher priority feature enhancement requests, we will not pursue this capability at this time.

  17. Create a Private Channel in Microsoft Teams connector

    It would be great to update the create channels action in the Microsoft Teams connector or NWC to be able to select between a standard channel and a private channel.

    Creating a private channel would also require specifying the owner of the channel.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Ability to add Auto-place (anchor tagging) to documents for Docusign

    When sending a document for signature it would be good to be able to add auto-place anchors to the document (as can be done in K2) so that placeholders are added for signature, names, dates etc when the user signs the document.

    https://developers.docusign.com/docs/esign-rest-api/esign101/concepts/tabs/auto-place/

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for your feedback. This looks like a request for the DocuSign service to understand dynamic signature tags.  Nintex does not have a way to control that and it would have to be handled by DocuSign.  In the mean time there might be alternative solutions via Nintex AssignSign.  To learn more about AssureSign click here or contact your Nintex Account Manager. 

  19. Add the ability to "lock" a list item against a workflow so that only one instance can run concurrently

    Add the ability to "lock" a list item against a workflow so that only one instance can run concurrently per list item.

    If you are running a sharepoint online trigger, this would be a great addition.

    At the minute, sharepoint online modified on triggers can fire multiple times, unless you immediately update the item with a field to stop the trigger. This can be problematic when multiple workflows need to be triggered against an item at the same time, as the multiple immediate update item actions will conflict.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Connor, thanks for the suggestion – the lock you’re describing here already exists and for most scenarios it does not trigger another workflow.

    There’s a workaround this which is to use separate connections for the start event and action. You’ll then need to configure the start event with a condition to filter out on the user used in the action’s connection.

    If this is still a challenge, please let me know and we can have a chat.

    In the future we will look to make distinct connections for start event and actions and by default the start event will filter out events that were triggered by the connection used for actions.

  20. Energie und Umwelt - Nicht bei jedem Vorhaben Relevant, und Umbenennung des Dokumentes im Workflow

    1. Was mache ich, wenn mein Vorhaben keine Checkliste für Energie und Umwelt benötigt? Ich benötige eine Kostenfreigabe für einen externen Dienstleister und habe jetzt einfach ein Liste mit nur "Nein" hochgeladen und einer Anmerkung, dass das Dokument keine Relevanz hat für meine Vorhaben
    2. Evtl. Umbenennung bei des Abfragedokumentes für Energie und Umwelt auf den Namen des Dokumentes im Kompass:
    3. Checkliste Energie- und Umweltaspekte F 007 -
    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Workflow Designer  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7
  • Don't see your idea?

5 - Nintex Workflow Cloud

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base