Provide the support for using a UDA within another UDA
Currently when we want to create a complex UDA with the help of smaller UDA, we are not seeing the way to add a UDA within another.
Such a scenario is always looked upon, in terms of re-usability. It would be nice to have support for use of UDAs within a UDA
Abhijith Shastry
shared this idea
-
Michael Niermann
commented
-
Michael Niermann
commented
-
Mark Uden
commented
I'd love this change, but I suspect it's not possible. My understanding is that UDAs are embedded into the workflows that utilise them, a bit like an auto-updating chunk of reusable workflow. If your UDA called itself, you would have an indeterminate chain of UDAs and this would be impossible to embed within a workflow. What we really need is an alternative to a UDA which actually acts more like a function in JavaScript, where workflow and functions it called were entirely separate.
-
Caroline Jung
commented
It would be so great if it would be possible to use another UDA in a UDA.