It would help a lot to have the possibility to see whenever needed who was the person who last modified a Nintex form for O365.
At this moment this detail are not available but the date only.
Knowing the who change it would help us a lot when debugging an issue as we would be able to collaborate with that person and find the needed info.

Missing the ability to add buttons.

Also ability to customise buttons Save and Continue or Save and Submit -> set connected field on submit and set it’s value to something

Currently, Nintex Form unable to display the historic version of the SharePoint List Item. Nintex Forms can only display the most recent version of the item the user has access too.

When using Nintex Form, the user should be able to get the item historic version and not the most recent one.

[ ref:00D90q6Cb.5009027Qcft:ref ]

It would help a lot if we could, manually and whenever needed, Print to PDF Multiple Forms ( SP Items in a list) at a time. Could you please add this feature to the existing Print To PDF button in Nintex Forms O365?

The O365 version of the classic form does not allow you to lookup lists on different sites. This is very restrictive

It would be good if you could either set the collapse functionality to collapsed by default and or apply a rule in the rules engine to collapse a group automatically.

Like mentioned in this user voice: https://nintex.uservoice.com/forums/218293-4-nintex-forms-for-office-365/suggestions/19051840-improve-form-load-speed-in-o365, the loading speed for new responsive forms is not fast enough.
In the meantime, it would be good to display a loading icon or text like "Form loading, please wait" to not confuse users who want to use the form.

Currently we can only see how many Forms licenses are used in the customer portal. For workflows we can see where they are with Hawkeye. For Forms we are flying blind and have no way of identifying where the license usage is going/coming from or the miss use of Forms Licenses. Currently it's an unconrolable cost with no visibility of where the cost is coming from nor do we know what we need to support unless someone tells the SharePoint Team.

When having Repeating section in List Form and then try to display this repeating section in the Nintex Task Form, the repeating section data is not populated in the Task Form (New Responsive Form)

[ ref:00D90q6Cb.5002v2SV6nd:ref ]

This is to build a single corporate branding style for all forms on the tenant.

It’s great in the new responsive designer and pages. It would be even more power full if you could apply rules from the rules engine to pages example if this is ticked show page or if this is or isn’t ticket hide page

Currently, the New Responsive Form only returns the first list item matched.
Please implement the ability to return multiple results.

[ ref:00D90q6Cb.5002v2fRBIo:ref ]

The Nintex forms controls of Single Line Textbox, Multi Line Textbox, People, and Choice both allow for a Default value.

However, I do not see that option for a List Lookup control. It would be extremely helpful to be able to pre-select items in our list lookup.

While generating the rule, for look up fields, we can only check if it is filled or blank. But we want to create rules based on the look up value. Please find the screenshot attached.

In the Image Control the Image URL doesn't allow to use any Named Controls. It would be helpful if you can add Named Controls to the Image URL. This way if you grab a URL from another list you can add it to the Image Control.

It is extremely difficult to track the license usage for Nintex Forms on Office 365. The XML library also seems inaccurate and tracking the GUID is very cumbersome. I hope that there is a functionality similar to Hawkeye for Nintex Forms coming soon.

Nintex Forms online webpart

When using a repeatable in New Responsive Forms Experience you are able to apply rules to adjust the value of an individual field based on others within that same row.

However, when you apply formatting e.g. Control Fill it applies to all instances of that field instead of the individual instance on that row.

The attached screen recording shows the bug.